Electron-positron collisions and decay in Special Relativity

AI Thread Summary
A particle physicist aims to create a new fundamental particle with a rest energy of 200 GeV by colliding electrons and positrons. The minimum energy required for the positron, when both particles are traveling in opposite directions at equal speeds, is calculated to be 100 GeV. The discussion highlights the use of 4-momentum in the calculations, but notes a misunderstanding regarding the momentum of the particles. The additional energy needed for the decay products, which are two particles with a rest mass of 91.2 GeV each, is identified as kinetic energy. The conversation emphasizes that simple conservation of energy can simplify the problem.
Keano16
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A particle physicist seeks to create a new fundamental particle with rest energy
200GeV by colliding electrons and positrons. What is the minimum positron energy
required when electrons and positrons traveling in opposite directions with equal speeds are
collided together?

The new particle is produced using this method with the minimum necessary
energy, and rapidly decays into two identical particles of rest energy 91.2GeV

Homework Equations



E2-p2c2=m2c4

The Attempt at a Solution



I am trying to do this question using 4-momentum. For a positron I have it as (E, p1, 0, 0) and for the electron I have it as once again (E, p2, 0, 0) (we are allowed to approximate the mass of a positron to that of an electron), the resultant being (2E, p1+p2, 0, 0).

I then equate (2E)2-(p1+p2)2=(200x103)2 (Working in MeV)

However, the problem I get is that as these particles are of essentially equal mass, and moving in opposite directions with the same speed, does p1+p2 in the 4-momentum effectively become 0?

If so, I get 4E2=(200x103)2
giving E=100GeV

I think there's something I am missing, as in the next part it says two particles of rest mass 91.2GeV are produced, which exceeds this energy. Or does this energy translate to kinetic energy for the 200GeV particle?

Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's no need to work so hard; simple Conservation of energy will solve the first part. Just 200/2 = 100GeV does the trick.
For the second part, the "missing energy" is indeed the kinetic energy of the decay products.
 
Ah right I see now. Thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top