Electron velocity after Compton Scattering

Inferniac
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In Compton scattering,how much energy must the photon have in order for
the scattered electron to achieve relativistic velocity?


Homework Equations


Compton scattering formula: $$λ'-λ=\frac{h}{mc}(1-cosθ)$$
##E=\frac{h}{λ}##,conservation of mass and momentum,possibly Lorentz transformations for velocity and kinetic energy?


The Attempt at a Solution


My train of thought goes like this:
Assume that θ=90°. That gives us ##λ'-λ=\frac{h}{mc}##.
##λ'-λ## can easily be turned into ##E'-E## using ##E=\frac{h}{λ}##.
Using law of conservation of energy we solve for the kinetic energy of the scattered electron
Since we now know the electron's kinetic energy we can calculate its speed.

My problem lies with my first assumption.I don't know if it's correct. It was made after a hint that my professor made that we should use big angles.

Please note that I don't study physics in English so some things might require clarification.

Thank you for your time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you should assume 180o so that energy trasferred from photon to electron is maximal.
 
Hi inferniac, welcome to physicsforums :)

The equation E=\frac{h}{λ} is true in a natural system of units (where c=1), but in the rest of your post, it looks like you are keeping c not equal to 1. So maybe you forgot a c in the equation above?

Also, szynkasz has the right idea with the angle, although it is not usual in this forum to give the answer outright.
 
Thank you for the welcome.

You are absolutely correct,I misstyped ##E=\frac{h}{λ}## instead of ##E=\frac{hc}{λ}## the first time and I copy-pasted again.
Yes,assuming a 180° angle makes more sense.I'll see were it goes from here.

Thanks again for your time.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top