Electrostatic Energy in the Hydrogen Atom

Keiner Nichts
Messages
13
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


We model the Hydrogen atom as a charge distribution in which the proton (a point charge) is surrounded by negative charge with the volume density of ρ = -ρ0 * exp (-2r/a0) where a0 is the Bohr radius. And ρ0 is a constant chosen such that the entire atomic distribution is neutral. What is the electrostatic energy contained within the electric field of outer region of the sphere of radius a0?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I have tried reducing the sphere to a point charge, but it doesn't work for neutral distributions (Should've figured that sooner.) Generally, I've tried to apply everything I could as far as the formula W (energy) = ∫ φ * dq goes (where φ is the electrostatic potential, and dq is the charge.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you need to build up the charge density around the proton as a function of radius and as you begin to add layers of negative charge, the electric field and the potential will be reduced in amplitude. Besides the negative electrostatic energy from the negative electric charge distribution, the electric field energy density has a term that i believe is ## U=E^2/(8 \pi) ## in cg.s. units. The question seems to be asking for the electric field energy for ## r>a_o ##, but the question doesn't appear to be entirely clear. The electric field can be computed as a function of r using Gauss's law. The question being asked seems to need some additional clarification. By electrostatic energy, do they mean electric charge distribution interacting with electric field or just the electric field energy?
 
I reckon merely the electric field energy. Though, unfortunately, that is as clear as the question gets...For a superficial distribution I was able to simply assess the potential of interaction between the proton and the electron, and also the potential the electron generates when it interacts with itself, then I used said potential to calculate the energy as the sum between the two respective interaction energies. Though it seems that making it a volume distribution rather than a surface one complicates things further.
 
Keiner Nichts said:
I reckon merely the electric field energy. Though, unfortunately, that is as clear as the question gets...For a superficial distribution I was able to simply assess the potential of interaction between the proton and the electron, and also the potential the electron generates when it interacts with itself, then I used said potential to calculate the energy as the sum between the two respective interaction energies. Though it seems that making it a volume distribution rather than a surface one complicates things further.
Suggestion is to first compute the constant ## \rho_o ## and then compute the electric field as a function of ## r ## (a simple calculation involving Gauss's law.). Finally, compute the electric field energy (as a function of ## r ##) from energy density ## U=E^2/(8 \pi) ##. (Please check this formula but I think I got it correct.) I would compute the electric field energy for both cases ## r<a_o ## and ## r>a_o ## and then even add them for the total electric field energy. It would appear they are not interested in the electrostatic energy of the form ## W=q \phi ##. Note: Gauss law in cgs units reads ## \int E \cdot dA=4 \pi Q ## where ## Q ## is enclosed charge. (The problem can also be worked in mks units where Gauss law has ## Q/\epsilon_o ## on the right side and the energy density expression also has a different constant.)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Keiner Nichts
Thank you. I think I might've reached a rather satisfactory result using the form in mks units. It seems alright dimensionally, at least.
 
  • Like
Likes Charles Link
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top