Electrostatic Equilibrium on the x-axis

AI Thread Summary
To achieve electrostatic equilibrium on the x-axis with two negative charges, a positive charge q3 must be positioned where the forces exerted by q1 and q2 on it are equal. The initial assumption of placing q3 between the two charges was reconsidered due to the differing magnitudes of the negative charges. Using Coulomb's law, the forces were expressed in terms of distance, leading to a calculation that resulted in x = 0.571 m. However, there was a concern regarding the proper squaring of denominators in the calculations. The final answer remains uncertain pending verification of the algebraic steps.
kevykevy
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Question - Three charges lie along the x acis as shown below. The negative charge q1 = 25 uC is at x = 2.0 m, the negative charge q2 = 6.0 uC is at the origin. Where must a positive charge q3 be placed on the x-axis such that the resultant force on it is zero?

Answer - I was thinking the third charge (q3) would be in the middle of the other two charges, my only doubt is that that would be too easy of an answer seeing how this is supposed to be harder than the normal homework. Am I right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
After re-reading the question, I realize that the two negative charges are different. So should I place the q3 6/15 away from q2?
 
kevykevy said:
After re-reading the question, I realize that the two negative charges are different. So should I place the q3 6/15 away from q2?
Your leaning somewhat in the right direction, but the forces are inversely proportional to the square of the distance betwen charges. Use Coulomb's law to write the forces calling one distance x and the other distance 2m - x and make the magnitudes of the two forces equal.
 
k so I'll have:

(9x10^9)(6x10^-6)(q3)/x = (9x10^9)(1.5x10^-5)(q3)/2 - x

54000(q3)/x = 135000(q3)/2 - x

54000/x = 135000/2 - x

108000/x = 135000/-x

108000(-x) = 135000(x)

How do I solve from there? Did I make an algebraic error?
 
I tried again and found my mistake, so my final answer is:

x = 0.571428571 m

Correct?
 
kevykevy said:
I tried again and found my mistake, so my final answer is:

x = 0.571428571 m

Correct?
I don't know if that is the correct result, but in your previous post the denominators should all have been squared. Did you fix that?
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top