ElectroStatic Equilibrium problem

AI Thread Summary
To determine the position of particle 3 such that the net electrostatic force on it is zero, it is essential to correctly apply Coulomb's law. The assumption that particle 3 should be placed between particles 1 and 2 is valid, but the distances must be accurately defined. The relationship between the distances from particle 3 to particles 1 and 2 is crucial, with the distance to particle 1 being L - d and to particle 2 being d. By substituting q2 with 3q1 in the equations derived from Coulomb's law, the problem can be simplified. Correctly setting up the equations will lead to the solution for the coordinates of particle 3.
RandellK02
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


particle 1 of charge q1 (at origin) and particle 2 of charge q2 = 3q1, are held at separation L on an x axis. If particle 3 of unknown charge q3 is to be located such that the net electrostatic force on it from particles 1 and 2 is zero, what must be the (a) x and (b) y coordinates of particle 3?


Homework Equations


F=k|q1||q2|/d2


The Attempt at a Solution


I assumed q1 and q2 are like charges so I put q3 in the middle. This could be my mistake since I am getting incorrect answers for x, I do know y = 0.
If q3 does belong between the two charges on the X axis, then I am not setting up my d2 part of Coulombs law. Could someone point me to the right direction?
Net Force = 0
F31=k|q3||q1|/?2
F32=k|q3||q2|/?2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
if the particle is at distance d away from q1, what distance is it between the particle and q2? assuming this is a one dimensional problem
 
wukunlin said:
if the particle is at distance d away from q1, what distance is it between the particle and q2? assuming this is a one dimensional problem

Okay say, if distance between q3 and q2 =d than distance between q3 and q1 is L - d correct? So...
kq3q1/(L-d)2=kq3q2/d2
=>q1/(L-d)2=q2/d2

If the above steps are correct... is it safe to assume to use the fact: q2=3q1 to eliminate the two charges?
 
yes :)
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top