ElectroStatic Equilibrium problem

AI Thread Summary
To determine the position of particle 3 such that the net electrostatic force on it is zero, it is essential to correctly apply Coulomb's law. The assumption that particle 3 should be placed between particles 1 and 2 is valid, but the distances must be accurately defined. The relationship between the distances from particle 3 to particles 1 and 2 is crucial, with the distance to particle 1 being L - d and to particle 2 being d. By substituting q2 with 3q1 in the equations derived from Coulomb's law, the problem can be simplified. Correctly setting up the equations will lead to the solution for the coordinates of particle 3.
RandellK02
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


particle 1 of charge q1 (at origin) and particle 2 of charge q2 = 3q1, are held at separation L on an x axis. If particle 3 of unknown charge q3 is to be located such that the net electrostatic force on it from particles 1 and 2 is zero, what must be the (a) x and (b) y coordinates of particle 3?


Homework Equations


F=k|q1||q2|/d2


The Attempt at a Solution


I assumed q1 and q2 are like charges so I put q3 in the middle. This could be my mistake since I am getting incorrect answers for x, I do know y = 0.
If q3 does belong between the two charges on the X axis, then I am not setting up my d2 part of Coulombs law. Could someone point me to the right direction?
Net Force = 0
F31=k|q3||q1|/?2
F32=k|q3||q2|/?2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
if the particle is at distance d away from q1, what distance is it between the particle and q2? assuming this is a one dimensional problem
 
wukunlin said:
if the particle is at distance d away from q1, what distance is it between the particle and q2? assuming this is a one dimensional problem

Okay say, if distance between q3 and q2 =d than distance between q3 and q1 is L - d correct? So...
kq3q1/(L-d)2=kq3q2/d2
=>q1/(L-d)2=q2/d2

If the above steps are correct... is it safe to assume to use the fact: q2=3q1 to eliminate the two charges?
 
yes :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top