Solve Electrostatic Force Problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving an electrostatic force problem involving two charged particles, q1 and q2, with specified coordinates and charges. The magnitude of the electrostatic force on particle 2 due to particle 1 is calculated to be 35 N, with a direction of -10 degrees. The challenge lies in determining the coordinates for a third particle, q3, such that the net force on it from both q1 and q2 is zero. The approach suggests placing q3 on the line connecting q1 and q2, with a derived distance formula to find its position. Further clarification is provided on constructing a unit vector to determine the exact coordinates for q3 based on the calculated distance.
PFStudent
Messages
169
Reaction score
0
TITLE: Hard Electric Charge Problem.

Homework Statement



15. The charges and coordinates of two charged particles held fixed in an xy plane are q_{1} = +3.0 \muC, x_{1} = 3.5 cm, y_{1} = 0.50 cm, and q_{2} = -4.0 \muC, x_{2} = -2.0 cm, y_{2} = 1.5 cm. Find the
(a) magnitude and
(b) direction of the electrostatic force on particle 2 due to particle 1. At what
(c) x and
(d) y coordinates should a third particle of charge q_{3} = +4.0 \muC be placed such that the net electrostatic force on particle 3 due to particle 1 and 2 is zero.

Homework Equations



Coulomb's Law:

Vector Form:

<br /> \vec{F}_{12} = \frac{k_{e}q_{1}q_{2}}{{r_{12}}^2}\hat{r}_{21}<br />

Scalar Form:

<br /> |\vec{F}_{12}| = \frac{k_{e}|q_{1}||q_{2}|}{{r_{12}}^2}<br />

The Attempt at a Solution



q_{1} = +3.0 \muC

x_{1} = 3.5 cm

y_{1} = 0.50 cm

q_{2} = -4.0 \muC

x_{2} = -2.0 cm

y_{2} = 1.5 cm

q_{3} = +4.0 \muC

x_{3} = ?

y_{3} = ?

(a)

<br /> |\vec{F}_{21}| = \frac{k_{e}|q_{1}||q_{2}|}{{r_{21}}^2}<br />

r_{21} = \sqrt{(x_{2}-x_{1})^2+((y_{2}-y_{1})^2}

<br /> |\vec{F}_{21}| = \frac{k_{e}|q_{1}||q_{2}|}{(\sqrt{(x_{2}-x_{1})^2+((y_{2}-y_{1})^2})^2}<br />

<br /> |\vec{F}_{21}| = \frac{k_{e}|q_{1}||q_{2}|}{(x_{2}-x_{1})^2+((y_{2}-y_{1})^2}<br />

<br /> sig. fig. \equiv 2<br />

<br /> |\vec{F}_{21}| = 35{\textcolor[rgb]{1.00,1.00,1.00}{.}}N<br />

(b)

<br /> tan\theta = \frac{y_{2}-y_{1}}{x_{2}-x_{1}}<br />

<br /> \theta = arctan\left(\frac{y_{2}-y_{1}}{x_{2}-x_{1}}\right)<br />

<br /> sig. fig. \equiv 2<br />

\theta = -10 degrees

\theta = 3.5 x 10 degrees or 6.1 rad.

(c) and (d)

Ok, here is where I am stuck. I can’t find the (x_{3}, y_{3}) such that the net force on q_{3} will be zero.

So here is how I approach these parts.

\Sigma \vec{F}_{3} = 0

0 = \vec{F}_{31} + \vec{F}_{32}

-\vec{F}_{31} = \vec{F}_{32}

|\vec{F}_{31}| = |\vec{F}_{32}|

<br /> \frac{k_{e}|q_{3}||q_{1}|}{{r_{31}}^2} = \frac{k_{e}|q_{3}||q_{2}|}{{r_{32}}^2}<br />

<br /> \frac{|q_{1}|}{|q_{2}|} = \frac{{r_{31}}^2}{{r_{32}}^2}<br />

<br /> \frac{|q_{1}|}{|q_{2}|} = \frac{(\sqrt{(x_{3}-x_{1})^2 + (y_{3}-y_{1})^2})^2}{(\sqrt{(x_{3}-x_{2})^2+ (y_{3}-y_{2})^2})^2}<br />

<br /> \frac{|q_{1}|}{|q_{2}|} = \frac{(x_{3}-x_{1})^2 + (y_{3}-y_{1})^2}{(x_{3}-x_{2})^2+ (y_{3}-y_{2})^2}<br />

Two unknowns, one equation…, so then I figured that q_{3} can only be placed on the line of force through q_{1} and q_{2}.

The line of force is the imaginary axis (line) through q_{1} and q_{2}.

Therefore, we essentially have a simple single axis problem where we need to find where on the same axis a charge q_{3} can be placed such that the force on it due to q_{1} and q_{2} is zero.

In solving this problem, I referred to the following principle,
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Given any two arbitrary un-like sign charges: q_{1} and q_{2}, placed on an x-axis a distance L from each other. Then, the placement (on the x-axis) of a charge q_{3} such that the net force on q_{3} due to: q_{1} and q_{2}, will be zero. Can be given as follows,

q_{1}q_{2} &lt; 0 \therefore q_{1}q_{2} \equiv -

<br /> |q_{1}| &lt; |q_{2}|, |\vec{r}_{31}| &lt; |\vec{r}_{32}|, |\vec{r}_{32}| &gt; L<br />

<br /> |q_{1}| = |q_{2}|<br />, No equilibrium exists on x-axis.

<br /> |q_{1}| &gt; |q_{2}|, |\vec{r}_{31}| &gt; |\vec{r}_{32}|, |\vec{r}_{32}| &gt; L<br />
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<br /> |q_{1}| &lt; |q_{2}|<br />

Then,

<br /> |\vec{r}_{31}| &lt; |\vec{r}_{32}|<br />

Where,

<br /> |\vec{r}_{32}| &gt; L<br />

Therefore, the charge q_{3} must be placed (on the line of force) to the right of q_{3}. We then let the distance between,

q_{1} and q_{3} = c

Now, going back to the original relationship,

<br /> \frac{|q_{1}|}{{r_{31}}^2} = \frac{|q_{2}|}{{r_{32}}^2}<br />

Now noting that: r_{31} = c and r_{32} = r_{12} + c

Then,

<br /> \frac{|q_{1}|}{{(c)}^2} = \frac{|q_{2}|}{{(r_{12} + c)}^2}<br />

Then, through some algebra the following result is arrived,

<br /> c = \frac{r_{12}}{\pm \sqrt{\frac{|q_{2}|}{|q_{1}|}-1}}<br />

Since, r_{12} \equiv distance r from 1 to 2.

Then,

<br /> r_{12} = \sqrt{(x_{2}-x_{1})^2+(y_{2}-y_{1})^2}<br />

Substituting,

<br /> c = \frac{\sqrt{(x_{2}-x_{1})^2+(y_{2}-y_{1})^2}}{\pm \sqrt{\frac{|q_{2}|}{|q_{1}|}-1}}<br />

Letting, (for convenience) sig. fig. \equiv 4,

c = 0.3614 m, -0.024 m

Note: Real distance cannot be negative, therefore,

c = 0.3614 m

Ok, so I am now stuck, how am I supposed to use this distance, c to find the coordinates: x_{3} and y_{3}?

Any help would be appreciated. :)

Thanks,

-PFStudent
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your logic is impeccable and the c is correct. To find a position c away from P1 in the direction pointed to by P1-P2, form a vector c*(P1-P2)/sqrt((P1-P2)^2) and add it to P1. Do you see how that works? It's c times a unit vector pointing the correct direction added to the initial position.
 
Last edited:
Dick said:
Your logic is impeccable and the c is correct. To find a position c away from P1 in the direction pointed to by P1-P2, form a vector c*(P1-P2)/sqrt((P1-P2)^2) and add it to P1. Do you see how that works? It's c times a unit vector pointing the correct direction added to the initial position.

Hey,

Thanks for the information, I looked over what you suggested and I couldn't quite, understand what you were trying to say.

So far, this is as much as I could gather, that given a distance,

<br /> r_{13} = c<br />

How is it that I construct a unit vector pointing in the correct direction and add that to the initial position? How do I do that? How does that lead me to to the coordinates,

<br /> (x_{3}, y_{3})?<br />

As far as the distance vector for q_{1} to q_{3}, isn't that the following,

<br /> \vec{r}_{13} = x_{3}\hat{i}-y_{3}\hat{j}<br />

I don't understand how this helps, me solve for (x_{3}, y_{3}).

Thanks for the help, any more information is appreciated.

Thanks,

-PFStudent
 
Last edited:
Ok. P1=(x1,y1), P2=(x2,y2). P1-P2=(x1-x2,y1-y2) is a vector that points in the direction from P2 towards P1. It has length L=sqrt((x1-x2)^2+(y1-y2)^2) (the distance between P1 and P2). So (P1-P2)/L points in the same direction and has length 1 (its a unit vector). So c*(P1-P2)/L points in the same direction and has length c. So P1+c*(P2-P1)/L lies along the line between P2 and P1 but c units outside of the interval between P1 and P2 and nearest to P1. And I think that's what you want.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top