Electrostatic forces and distance when considering changes in potentia

AI Thread Summary
As distance increases between charged particles, potential energy decreases, leading to an increase in kinetic energy of gas molecules. This aligns with the electric potential energy formula but contrasts with gravitational potential energy, which may require further exploration. The confusion arises from the assumption that gas molecules are oppositely charged; however, gas molecules can still attract each other through electric forces despite having zero net charge. The potential energy of these molecules increases as they move farther apart, reflecting the nature of their interactions. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping the behavior of gases under varying distances.
Hereformore
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
Question:
ImageUploadedByPhysics Forums1410202958.630146.jpg


Relevant formulas:
kei + pei = kef + pef

U = kqq/r

Attempt at solution:

I thought that as distance increases potential energy would go down and so that energy would have to go to the kinetic energy of the gasses, so kinetic energy would increase.

This is consistent with the formula for electric potential energy but not consistent with the potential energy for gravity (wondering if there's a reason why/why it isn't consistent).

The book I am using says that since the molecules are attracted to each other, as they get farther away, their potential energy increases.

Is that because we're assuming the gas molecules are oppositely charged? So potential energy would be negative, and thus less negative when further away?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello, Hereformore.

Gas molecules generally have zero net charge. Nevertheless, they can still attract each other via electric forces! You can read about it here or here .
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top