Electrostatics - Coulomb's Law

  • #1
WhiteWolf98
86
5

Homework Statement


The magnitude of the electrostatic force between point charges ##q_1 = 26~\mu C## and ##q_2 = 47~\mu C## is initially ##F_1=5.70~N##. The separation distance between the charges, ##r_1## is then changed such that the magnitude of the force is, ##F_2=0.57~N##.

(a) What is the ratio of the new separation distance, ##r_2## to the initial separation, ##r_1##?

(b) What is the new separation distance, ##r_2##?

Homework Equations


##F=K \cdot \frac {q_1 \cdot q_2} {r^2}##, where ##K \approx 8.99×10^9##

The Attempt at a Solution


##5.70=\frac {K|q_1||q_2|} {{r_1}^2}##

##r_1=\sqrt {\frac {K|q_1||q_2|} {5.70}}##

##0.57=\frac {K|q_1||q_2|} {{r_2}^2}##

##r_2=\sqrt {\frac {K|q_1||q_2|} {0.57}}##

What's even the point of the ratio when all elements are present in the formula...?

##\frac {r_2} {r_1}=\frac {\sqrt {\frac {K|q_1||q_2|} {0.57}}} {\sqrt {\frac {K|q_1||q_2|} {5.70}}}##

##\frac {r_2} {r_1}=\frac {(\sqrt {\frac {K|q_1||q_2|} {0.57}})^2} {(\sqrt {\frac {K|q_1||q_2|} {5.70}})^2}##

##\frac {r_2} {r_1}=\frac {\frac {K|q_1||q_2|} {0.57}} {\frac {K|q_1||q_2|} {5.70}}##

##\frac {r_2} {r_1}=\frac {5.70} {0.57}##

##r_2=10r_1##

Working them out individually:

##K\cdot(47×10^{-6})(26×10^{-6})=10.98~ (to~3~s.f.)\gg (B)##

##5.70=\frac {B} {{r_1}^2}##

##r_1= \sqrt {\frac {B} {5.70}}=1.39~m~(to~3~s.f.)##

##r_2= \sqrt {\frac {B} {0.57}}=4.39~m~(to~3~s.f.)##

I'd expect ##r_2## to be larger, since the force is smaller. But it doesn't agree with the ratio... Have I made a wrong assumption or calculation somewhere?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
PeroK
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2022 Award
23,784
15,399

Homework Statement


The magnitude of the electrostatic force between point charges ##q_1 = 26~\mu C## and ##q_2 = 47~\mu C## is initially ##F_1=5.70~N##. The separation distance between the charges, ##r_1## is then changed such that the magnitude of the force is, ##F_2=0.57~N##.

(a) What is the ratio of the new separation distance, ##r_2## to the initial separation, ##r_1##?

(b) What is the new separation distance, ##r_2##?

Homework Equations


##F=K \cdot \frac {q_1 \cdot q_2} {r^2}##, where ##K \approx 8.99×10^9##

The Attempt at a Solution


##5.70=\frac {K|q_1||q_2|} {{r_1}^2}##

##r_1=\sqrt {\frac {K|q_1||q_2|} {5.70}}##

##0.57=\frac {K|q_1||q_2|} {{r_2}^2}##

##r_2=\sqrt {\frac {K|q_1||q_2|} {0.57}}##

What's even the point of the ratio when all elements are present in the formula...?

##\frac {r_2} {r_1}=\frac {\sqrt {\frac {K|q_1||q_2|} {0.57}}} {\sqrt {\frac {K|q_1||q_2|} {5.70}}}##

>>
##\frac {r_2} {r_1}=\frac {(\sqrt {\frac {K|q_1||q_2|} {0.57}})^2} {(\sqrt {\frac {K|q_1||q_2|} {5.70}})^2}##

>>

The above step is an error. Did you forget to square the left hand side?

##\frac {r_2} {r_1}=\frac {\frac {K|q_1||q_2|} {0.57}} {\frac {K|q_1||q_2|} {5.70}}##

##\frac {r_2} {r_1}=\frac {5.70} {0.57}##

##r_2=10r_1##

Working them out individually:

##K\cdot(47×10^{-6})(26×10^{-6})=10.98~ (to~3~s.f.)\gg (B)##

##5.70=\frac {B} {{r_1}^2}##

##r_1= \sqrt {\frac {B} {5.70}}=1.39~m~(to~3~s.f.)##

##r_2= \sqrt {\frac {B} {0.57}}=4.39~m~(to~3~s.f.)##

I'd expect ##r_2## to be larger, since the force is smaller. But it doesn't agree with the ratio... Have I made a wrong assumption or calculation somewhere?

See above.
 
  • Like
Likes WhiteWolf98
  • #3
WhiteWolf98
86
5
Ah. I didn't forget, I didn't think you had to. Oops.

Would ##r_2=\sqrt 10 r_1## then?
 
  • #4
PeroK
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2022 Award
23,784
15,399
Ah. I didn't forget, I didn't think you had to. Oops.

Would ##r_2=\sqrt 10 r_1## then?

Yes. It's an inverse square law. If the force reduces by a factor the distance increases by the square root of that factor.
 
  • Like
Likes WhiteWolf98
  • #5
WhiteWolf98
86
5
I see. But even using that formula, it doesn't give me the same ##r_2## value
 
  • #6
haruspex
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2022 Award
39,228
8,540
I see. But even using that formula, it doesn't give me the same ##r_2## value
It's as close as can be expected after rounding the individual distances to three sig figs.
What are you getting for the ratio? What if you take an extra digit in the rounding?
 
  • Like
Likes WhiteWolf98
  • #7
WhiteWolf98
86
5
Okay, for some reason I did it again, and it worked... either way, not complaining. Thank you both. How silly for it all to be just an algebra mistake in the end
 

Suggested for: Electrostatics - Coulomb's Law

Replies
11
Views
666
Replies
1
Views
404
Replies
2
Views
703
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
527
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
848
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
604
Replies
20
Views
925
Top