Elements of plasma kinetic theory, Bittencourt

Fernando Mourao
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider the motion of charged particles, in one dimension only, in
the presence of an electric potential V ( x). Show, by direct substitution,
that a function of the form

f=f(1/mv^2 + qV)

is a solution of the Boltzmann equation under steady-state conditions.

Homework Equations



∂f/∂t + v⋅∇f + a[∇][/v]f = 0

a= dv/dt
v=dr/dt

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I've been having problems with mathematical demonstrations due to lack of practice in the past 6 years. Any steering into the correct direction would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You simply need to replace the f in the left-hand-side of the Boltzmann equation with the function that was given and show that result is indeed 0. Since this is in 1D only, then ∇ = d/dx.
 
DrClaude said:
You simply need to replace the f in the left-hand-side of the Boltzmann equation with the function that was given and show that result is indeed 0. Since this is in 1D only, then ∇ = d/dx.
Thank you for your reply Dr Claude.

I understand the process of direct substitution and the fact that, in this case, ∇ = d/dx and ∇v=d/dvx.
But my problem is the mathematical proof. How to explicitly show that:

∂/∂t(f(½mv2+qV)) + v⋅∂/∂x(f(½mv2+qV)) + a⋅∂/∂vx(f(½mv2+qV))=0

v and a being vectors.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top