Marketeers have no qualms about outright lying.
To engineers, power rating of an amplifier is its capability at reasonable distortion without overheating.
That would be continuous RMS watts.
Peak power, calculated using the peak instead of RMS voltage and current would be twice that. That's a modest marketing lie.
To marketeers it is permissible to unabashedly lie by advertising the "Peak Instantaneous Power", or "Music Power" .
That is the absolute maximum volts X amps the amplifier can deliver during a transient lasting only an instant , disregarding distortion and duration of the transient.
It'll be probably the sum of all the channels of a multichannel amplifier because that makes the number bigger yet
Some crum-bums will even give a theoretical value that's calculated assuming power supply startup transient voltage !This paper by Texas Instruments explains the "dirty tricks" .
http://www.ti.com/lit/an/slea047a/slea047a.pdf
and gives actual test results.
.
Just looking at one of the devices in that paper
• TAS5142 – 4 half-bridges (2 BTL channels or 4 single-ended [SE] channels)
let's use the BTL (bridged) rnumbers
That IC can be rated
87 watts RMS continuous , no clipping (not noticeably distorted )
108.5 watts RMS continuous at 10% distortion
174 watts peak power (twice continuous as mentioned)
318 watts peak instantaneous power using the maximum rated voltage for the device. There being two BTL channels in the device, it could be marketed as 636 watts, maybe even more in some countries.
So - TI's VERY respectable 87 watt per channel bridged digital amplifier should be powered by about a two hundred watt supply, ~15 amps at 14 volts
even if it was bought as a "636 watt" amplifier
That's why i suggested OP look at the fuse.
and it's why i posted that preposterous supply . (well, also partly because i found one last week at my metal recycle yard , cost me 30 cents a pound not quite twelve bucks)
I would be surprised to find OP's "1500 watt" amplifier actually capable of 150 honest watts at 1% distortion.
Check out that TI paper , it's an eye opener.
old jim