Energy and motion from ##R^6 \rightarrow R##

AI Thread Summary
Energy is defined as a function of space and velocity, remaining constant over time in ideal conditions. The discussion centers on the function E: R^6 → R, where motion is suggested to occur on a 5-dimensional surface rather than in 6-dimensional space. This concept is linked to the equation E = K(𝑣) + U(𝑥), indicating that energy is a combination of kinetic and potential energy. The question arises about the nature of the object defined by the equation f(x,y) = constant, which describes a geometric shape, specifically a circle in this context. Understanding these dimensions and their implications is crucial for grasping the relationship between energy and motion.
fcoulomb
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
We know that energy is a function of space and velocity and it’s constant (in ideal case) though time.
So ## E(\vec{x}(t) , \vec{\dot{x}}(t)) = E_0##

where ##\vec{x} , \vec{\dot{x}} \in \mathbb{R}^3##.
So my function is ##E : \mathbb{R}^6 \rightarrow \mathbb{R}##.

Then there is my question: my teacher said that the motion will not be in a 6-dimensional space but on a 5-dimensional *surface*.
I don’t understand that statement (and maybe I understood it wrongly).
Anybody can help me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That fact ## E(\vec{x}(t) , \vec{\dot{x}}(t)) = E_0## is a consequence of ##E= K(\vec{\dot{x}})+ U(\vec{x})##
 
$$ f(x,y) =x^2 +y^2=R^2 $$
What kind of object is defined by f(x,y)=constant?
 
  • Like
Likes fcoulomb
nasu said:
$$ f(x,y) =x^2 +y^2=R^2 $$
What kind of object is defined by f(x,y)=constant?
Wow, thanks, you're right.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top