Energy and WET (Incline pulley system)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving an incline pulley system with two blocks, where the goal is to determine the change in kinetic energy of one of the blocks as it moves a specified distance. The context includes concepts from energy work, friction, and forces acting on the blocks.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore various expressions for kinetic energy change and work done by different forces, including gravitational and frictional forces. There are suggestions to reconsider the arrangement of trigonometric functions and to express height in terms of distance moved. Some participants question the necessity of including tension in the calculations and express confusion about its role.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing different approaches and questioning each other's reasoning. Some guidance has been offered regarding the inclusion of all forces acting on the blocks, and there is a suggestion to apply energy conservation principles to the system as a whole.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the roles of tension and the correct application of work-energy principles. Participants are also grappling with the need for additional information, such as initial and final kinetic energy values, to fully resolve the problem.

closer
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
A m1 = 45.0 kg block and a m2 = 105.0 kg block are connected by a string as in Figure P7.44. The pulley is frictionless and of negligible mass. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the 45.0 kg block and incline is 0.250. Determine the change in the kinetic energy of the 45.0 kg block as it moves from A to B, a distance of 20.0 m.

7-44alt.gif


[tex]\Delta[/tex]KE = Wnet
[tex]\Delta[/tex]KE = Wg - Wfk
[tex]\Delta[/tex]KE = mgh - (uk)(N)(x)
[tex]\Delta[/tex]KE = mgh - (uk)(mgcos[tex]\theta[/tex])(x)

Final answer is incorrect. Any ideas? Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe switch the trig and not trig around?

Gain in energy = potential gain: 20*sin(37)*9.8*45
loss in energy = friction work: (M1 Normal)*uk*20
 
closer said:
[tex]\Delta[/tex]KE = Wnet
[tex]\Delta[/tex]KE = Wg - Wfk
[tex]\Delta[/tex]KE = mgh - (uk)(N)(x)
[tex]\Delta[/tex]KE = mgh - (uk)(mgcos[tex]\theta[/tex])(x)
If you are going to apply the WET to m1 separately, you must include the work done by all forces, including string tension.

Also: Express h in terms of x. Be careful of the sign of the work contributions.
 
(delta KE) = (m2)(g)(h) - (m1)(g)(h)(sin(theta)) - (m)(g)(cos(theta))(uk)(x)

I added in the potential energy for the second block. Still incorrect. I don't understand why I would need tension, nor would I know how to incorporate it into the formula.

Edit: Isn't (m2)(g)(h) the string tension?
 
closer said:
(delta KE) = (m2)(g)(h) - (m1)(g)(h)(sin(theta)) - (m)(g)(cos(theta))(uk)(x)

I added in the potential energy for the second block. Still incorrect. I don't understand why I would need tension, nor would I know how to incorporate it into the formula.
If you are attempting to apply the WET to mass 1, then you need to include the work done by all forces on mass 1, including the string tension. Of course, this is the hard way to do this problem.

Edit: Isn't (m2)(g)(h) the string tension?
No.

I recommend that you use energy conservation on the system as a whole:
Ei + Wf = Ef

Where E is the total mechanical energy of both masses.
 
Maybe switch the trig and not trig around?

Gain in energy = potential gain: 20*sin(37)*9.8*45
loss in energy = friction work: (M1 Normal)*uk*20

Oops! Gain in energy = potential gain + kinetic gain; you would need to know initial and final kinetic for mine to work, I think. :frown:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K