Energy conservation and e = mc^2

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the distinction between kinetic energy (KE) and the energy-mass equivalence expressed in E=mc². Kinetic energy is calculated using the formula KE = 1/2 mv², which relates mass and velocity, while E=mc² represents the intrinsic rest energy of a mass, independent of its motion. The constant c in E=mc² refers to the speed of light, not a variable velocity like in the kinetic energy equation. The two equations describe different types of energy, with E=mc² linking mass to energy as a fundamental principle. Understanding this difference is essential for grasping concepts in energy conservation and relativity.
iommi0028
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
If Kinetic Energy is mv²/2 how come E=mc² is a valid equation.. wouldn't it have to be divided by two also because c represents a velocity? Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the equation e = mc^2 is a fundamental relation between mass and energy. A particle of mass m has an "intrinsic rest energy" Eo given by Eo = mc^2

im not 100% on the way that they derived k = 1/2 mv^2 but i do know that its only used when relating mass velocity and kinetic energy.

the Eo is the energy a mass has with no relation to velocity or position. the c is a velocity but its a relation to the speed of light your making, in 1/2 mv^2 the velocity your relating there is that of the particle of mass m.

basically the energies in the 2 equations are not the same, and in one your relating the speed of the mass, and in the other your relating a mass to a constant [the speed of light]

hope that helps.
 
the 1/2mv^2 is derived by integrating the force ma over a certain distance:
<br /> \int_{a}^{b}ma dx<br />
 
Last edited:
hey thanks that really cleared things up
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top