Energy conversion with constant velocity

AI Thread Summary
When a person descends an escalator at constant velocity, gravitational potential energy (GPE) decreases without a corresponding increase in kinetic energy (KE), indicating energy conversion into other forms, such as heat. Conversely, ascending the escalator involves gaining GPE while maintaining KE, which requires energy from chemical sources in the body. In the case of a crane lifting a box with constant force and acceleration, both GPE and KE increase, necessitating energy input from fuel sources. This energy is derived from various origins, including chemical fuels, solar, or wind energy. Overall, energy conversion involves transforming potential energy into other forms while accounting for energy sources and losses.
ZanyCat
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
This is just a very simple conceptual question.

Say that someone is going down an escalator at a constant velocity. They are losing GPE, but not gaining any KE. So where is this potential energy going? Same with going up, they're gaining GPE, but not losing any KE.

On a similar note, say that a crane is lifting a box upwards with a constant force, but now the box is accelerating upwards. The box is gaining GPE as well as gaining KE. Where is this energy coming from? What is losing energy accordingly?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So where is this potential energy going?
It is lost in heat, or can be used to compress a spring, or convert it to other forms of energy.
In the same way, to go up, you have to use chemical energy stored in your body (and you have to eat to refill this).
Where is this energy coming from? What is losing energy accordingly?
The fuel, in the crane or in a power plant*. Cranes need a lot of power.

*or the sun, the wind, or whatever is used to produce electric power
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top