Energy flow in an electrical circuit

AI Thread Summary
Energy in an electrical circuit is not solely tied to the movement of charges; rather, it involves the potential difference, or voltage, which indicates how much energy is transferred per coulomb of charge. The analogy of freight carts is misleading because it implies a round trip of charges, whereas energy flows in one direction from the battery to the load. In alternating current (AC), charges oscillate back and forth, allowing them to do work in both directions, similar to running back and forth rather than just in one direction. A potential difference of 6 volts means that, on average, each coulomb loses 6 joules of energy, despite the charges not moving in a net direction. Understanding this concept clarifies how AC can still effectively deliver energy to a load.
Jimmy87
Messages
692
Reaction score
19
Hi, could someone explain how energy and voltage operate in an electrical circuit. I'm really confused because I was reading a book on misconceptions in electric circuits which said that energy is not associated with the charges in a circuit. It goes on to say that if it did then you would have to wait for electrons from the battery to arrive at the the load. It says that a common analogy of voltage and energy is using freight carts. If you had a 6V battery then the battery gives the carts 6J of energy and the carts take them and drop them off at the load and then they go back to the battery to get re-filled. It says that this analogy is completely wrong and misleading. How should you view potential difference then? If the potential difference across a bulb is 6V then doesn't this mean that each coulomb of charge loses 6J of energy going across the bulb? But then how does this apply to a.c. because charge makes no net movement in any direction, they just vibrate back and forth due to the electric field? So what then does 6 joules per coulomb actually mean?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One electron pushes on the next pushes on the next pushes on the next... and so forth, and then eventually one of the electrons delivers energy as it is forced through the potential difference at the other end. Alternating current delivers energy because it doesn't matter which direction we're pushing the charge.

You might try imagining a long rigid rod with you holding on to one end. You can do work at the other end by pushing the rod (DC one direction) or by pulling it (DC the other direction), or pushing and pulling back and and forth (AC); and also that nothing is making any sort of round trip.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thanks for your answer that was really helpful. How would you interpret a p.d. of 6 joules per coulomb across a bulb which is driven by ac current? In a dc circuit I would say that each coulomb of charge passing through the bulb loses 6J of energy but since ac charges do not move, how do you interpret this in terms of joules per coulomb?
 
Jimmy87 said:
Hi, could someone explain how energy and voltage operate in an electrical circuit. I'm really confused because I was reading a book on misconceptions in electric circuits which said that energy is not associated with the charges in a circuit. It goes on to say that if it did then you would have to wait for electrons from the battery to arrive at the the load. It says that a common analogy of voltage and energy is using freight carts. If you had a 6V battery then the battery gives the carts 6J of energy and the carts take them and drop them off at the load and then they go back to the battery to get re-filled. It says that this analogy is completely wrong and misleading. How should you view potential difference then? If the potential difference across a bulb is 6V then doesn't this mean that each coulomb of charge loses 6J of energy going across the bulb? But then how does this apply to a.c. because charge makes no net movement in any direction, they just vibrate back and forth due to the electric field? So what then does 6 joules per coulomb actually mean?

The returning carts in a loop analogy is misleading because when we calculate the power flow from battery to load we don't see the kinetic (6J in your example) energy in the movement of charge (electrons) in a loop being dumped and coming back empty, we see a one way directional energy movement from the battery to load on both wires that matches the flow of power.

http://sites.huji.ac.il/science/stc/staff_h/Igal/Research Articles/Pointing-AJP.pdf
 
Last edited:
Jimmy87 said:
Thanks for your answer that was really helpful. How would you interpret a p.d. of 6 joules per coulomb across a bulb which is driven by ac current? In a dc circuit I would say that each coulomb of charge passing through the bulb loses 6J of energy but since ac charges do not move, how do you interpret this in terms of joules per coulomb?

With AC, the charges do move - first in one direction and then in the other. You will get just as tired running back and forth for an hour as you would running in one direction for an hour, and the charge can do just as much work moving back and forth as it would flowing in direction.

You can connect an oscilloscope (which is basically a device for displaying voltage changes that happen too quickly for the needle of a DC voltmeter to respond) across the light bulb. The oscilloscope will show that if the average potential difference is 6 volts (one volt is equal to one joule per coulomb) then the instantaneous potential varies from about -8.5 volts to +8.5 volts so first the charge moves one direction then the other, but it's doing work and lighting the bulb in both directions.

(Why 8.5? Well it just so happens that that's the peak value that makes the average come out to 6; google for "RMS peak" or "root mean square" for more detail).
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Nugatory said:
With AC, the charges do move - first in one direction and then in the other. You will get just as tired running back and forth for an hour as you would running in one direction for an hour, and the charge can do just as much work moving back and forth as it would flowing in direction.

You can connect an oscilloscope (which is basically a device for displaying voltage changes that happen too quickly for the needle of a DC voltmeter to respond) across the light bulb. The oscilloscope will show that if the average potential difference is 6 volts (one volt is equal to one joule per coulomb) then the instantaneous potential varies from about -8.5 volts to +8.5 volts so first the charge moves one direction then the other, but it's doing work and lighting the bulb in both directions.

(Why 8.5? Well it just so happens that that's the peak value that makes the average come out to 6; google for "RMS peak" or "root mean square" for more detail).

Thanks Nugatory. This is a great explanation and has really helped me!
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top