Energy gain in a resonant system

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the confusion regarding energy gain in passive resonant systems, particularly underdamped RLC circuits, where output amplitude can exceed input amplitude. Participants clarify that while the voltage gain may appear to exceed one, the overall energy or power does not increase due to the impedance transformation involved. A transformer analogy is used to illustrate that while voltage can be amplified, the current decreases proportionally, maintaining energy conservation. Additionally, it is noted that amplifiers are often necessary to prevent loading effects that could dampen resonance. Understanding these concepts helps clarify the apparent contradiction in passive systems exhibiting gain greater than one.
maldata
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Something is bothering me about passive systems in resonance. Consider the Bode plot of a second-order system, for example:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Harmonic_oscillator_gain.svg

Let's say we excite this system near its resonance, so the system has a gain > 1. I don't understand how this can be the case for a passive system like an RLC circuit. If the output amplitude is greater than the input amplitude, that energy has to come from somewhere.

What is it that I'm misunderstanding here? It seems like in a passive circuit, the output amplitude should, at most, be the same as the input amplitude. So how is there a gain of greater than 1?

Thanks.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Remember the power (and therefore energy) is not determined by one quantity alone.

Your graph is for the amplitude of a single quantity.

Look at what happens to the other quantities in one of the energy or power equations, particularly the impedance.
 
Hi Studiot, thanks for the reply.

I'm still not sure how that matters, though. In that plot, the gain at resonance is 100. So, say this is an underdamped RLC circuit. We put in a sinusoidal voltage with amplitude 1 at the resonant frequency, and we get out a sinusoidal voltage with amplitude 100. Regardless of what any of the other quantities are, we've just amplified a signal passively. I don't see how that's possible.

Other passive circuits make sense to me... an RC circuit or an overdamped RLC circuit never have gain greater than 1. So how can an underdamped RLC circuit do this?

Obviously there's still some concept I'm missing. Thoughts?

Thanks!
 
Think of a (perfect) transformer.

24 volts in 240 volts out.

Does it amplify the voltage?
Well yes.

Does it amplify the energy or power
Well no, because the current available is less, by the same factor (1/10 in this case)

Furthermore this may be viewed as an impedance transformation, from low impedance to high impedance, hence the lower current.

Your resonant circuit is the same. You will get out a higher voltage, but at higher impedance, so the minute you apply it to a load you will not be able to draw the same level of current as the original signal could support.

It is difficult to be more specific without specific values, so work a few out to see.
 
Ah. There's the analogy I was looking for... that seems a little more intuitive to me. Thanks for the insight!
 
In fact with resonant systems the impedance change usually so great that we have to use an amplifier to prevent the rest of the circuit loading (damping) the resonance completely.
We often place the resonant circuit in the feedback path of the amplifier for this purrpose, alternatively we buffer the resonant circuit with an amplifier. Thus we can inject the extra energy to maintain the amplification at lower impedance.
 
I have Mass A being pulled vertically. I have Mass B on an incline that is pulling Mass A. There is a 2:1 pulley between them. The math I'm using is: FA = MA / 2 = ? t-force MB * SIN(of the incline degree) = ? If MB is greater then FA, it pulls FA up as MB moves down the incline. BUT... If I reverse the 2:1 pulley. Then the math changes to... FA = MA * 2 = ? t-force MB * SIN(of the incline degree) = ? If FA is greater then MB, it pulls MB up the incline as FA moves down. It's confusing...
Hi. I noticed that all electronic devices in my household that also tell time eventually lag behind, except the ones that get synchronized by radio signal or internet. Most of them are battery-powered, except my alarm clock (which runs slow as well). Why does none of them run too fast? Deliberate design (why)? Wrong temperature for quartz crystal? Decreasing battery voltage? Or just a coincidence?
Back
Top