Energy in infinite square well

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the energy of a particle in an infinite square well defined from x=-L/2 to x=L/2. The user derived the energy formula E=(n^2*h^2)/(2mL^2) but noted a discrepancy when comparing it to the standard result E=(n^2*h^2)/(8mL^2) for a well from x=0 to x=L. The confusion stems from the application of boundary conditions and the impact of the well's position on the energy calculation. Another participant suggests that the user may have made an algebraic error, particularly in applying the boundary conditions. Ultimately, the user is seeking clarification on why the two methods yield different results despite the wells having the same width.
w3390
Messages
341
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the energy of a particle of mass m in an infinite square well with one end at x=-L/2 and the other at x=L/2.

Homework Equations



Schrodinger Equation

The Attempt at a Solution



To save time, I won't type the solving of the differential equation which results in the sin+cos terms. I eventually get to the point where I have found that \Psi(x)=Asin(2n*PI*x/L). Using boundary conditions, I found k=2n*PI/L.

From my differential equation, I have that k^2 = 2mE/h(bar)^2.

When I plug in k=2n*PI/L to the k^2 equation, it simplifies to:

E = (n^2*h^2)/(2mL^2)

My question is whether or not this is correct because when the infinite well has one end at x=0 and the other at x=L, the result is that:

E = (n^2*h^2)/(8mL^2)

It shouldn't matter where the well is placed as long as the width is the same. Why am I getting two different answers?

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm, yeah, you should get the same answer and you've probably made an algebraic error somewhere. I would carefully go over the application of the boundary conditions in the -L/2 to +L/2 case.
 
I don't think it's an algebraic error. I have worked the problem through, once using endpoints x=0 and x=L and again using x=-L/2 and x=L/2 and I don't get the same answer.

In the case where I am going from 0 to L, I get that the energy is E=(n^2*h^2)/8mL^2, which is correct.

In the case where I am going from -L/2 to L/2, I have the factor of 1/2 that ends up that ends up getting squared and reducing the eight in the denominator to a 4.
 
Any ideas?
 
I have a very similar problem with yours but from -a to a. So if you have any idea or something we could help each other
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top