Energy of a pendulum (variable length, Lyapunov)

Mugged
Messages
103
Reaction score
0
Hello, question about the energy of a variable length pendulum.

Suppose you have a pendulum in the standard sense where θ is the angle, and we let the length r be a function of time r = r(t). What is the energy of the pendulum?

So far, I have determined that kinetic energy is = (1/2)m(r*dθ/dt)^2 + (1/2)m*(dr/dt)^2
and the potential energy is = mgr(1-cosθ).

In my homework problem i need to come up with a suitable Lyapunov function to study the stability of the pendulum and the typical approach approach is to set the lyapunoc function V = E (energy).

But the problem is that this is a time varying lyapunov function, i.e. V = V(θ,t). And i have to satisfy a positive definite constraint on V that is V(0,t) = 0 for all t. the problem is that dr/dt term.

Is there another lyapunov function i can choose here? or am i misrepresenting the energy?
Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello robbed,

I don't see an answer here, but I do have a question: what can be a possible equilibrium point if you don't know anything about r(t) ?
 
So I already solved this question myself. Turns out that I did have the proper Lyapunov function.

Also BvU, in this homework problem there were some bounds given for r(t), and its derivatives which I omitted because it was irrelevant to my question. To answer your question though, there aren't any equilibrium points unless r(t) is constant. homework problem was about stability anyways,
 
Very good ! Thanks for the extra info.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
30
Views
3K
Back
Top