Energy partitioning (Attenuation)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating total amplitude attenuation of a seismic wave reflected at multiple interfaces with a reflection coefficient of 0.15. Participants debate whether the attenuation equation should be applied four or five times, leading to estimates of 9% or 11.25% amplitude loss, respectively. The consensus leans towards using the equation four times, as the wave transmits through four interfaces and reflects at the fifth before returning. Clarifications confirm that the wave is transmitted through the first four interfaces, reflected at the fifth, and then transmitted back through the same four. The final agreement supports the calculation of 9% attenuation based on four applications of the equation.
stubbe11
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A seismic wave travel from surface, is reflected at the fifth of a series of horizontal interfaces. Each has a reflection coefficient "R" of 0.15. What is the total attenuation in amplitude caused by energy partitioning at all encountered interfaces, when the wave returns to the surface?

Homework Equations


total loss = (1-R)(1+R) = (1-R^2) [for one layer]

The Attempt at a Solution


We have a discussion here, where some argue that the equation should be used 4 times, hence the answer is 9% of the amplitude has been attenuated. And some who argue that it should be used 5 times (11.25%). Any inputs as what could be the correct one?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
stubbe11 said:
the equation should be used 4 times, hence the answer is 9% of the amplitude has been attenuated. And some who argue that it should be used 5 times
Up to what point in the whole process? It has to be transmitted through 4, reflected at 1, then transmitted back through the first 4, no? Or have I misunderstood the question?
 
haruspex said:
Up to what point in the whole process? It has to be transmitted through 4, reflected at 1, then transmitted back through the first 4, no? Or have I misunderstood the question?
Thanks for your interest and time.

Well, it seems like you understood it like I did. Transmitted through 4 interfaces and reflected on the 5th, then transmitted back up to the surface through the same 4 interfaces. So would you agree on 4 times then?
 
stubbe11 said:
Thanks for your interest and time.

Well, it seems like you understood it like I did. Transmitted through 4 interfaces and reflected on the 5th, then transmitted back up to the surface through the same 4 interfaces. So would you agree on 4 times then?
Yes.
 
haruspex said:
Yes.
Big thanks!
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top