Engineering/commerce vs engineering and MBA later on

  • Thread starter Thread starter kr73114
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Engineering Mba
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the value of pursuing a traditional engineering degree versus a combined engineering and business degree. Participants express a preference for a pure engineering major, arguing that degrees incorporating business elements are often perceived as diluted or weaker. One individual reflects on their experience in a dual degree program, noting a growing dissatisfaction with the business component and a desire to focus solely on engineering, potentially pursuing an MBA later. Another contributor emphasizes the drawbacks of extended study time associated with double degrees, arguing that it delays entry into the workforce and the opportunity to earn a salary, suggesting that graduating sooner is more beneficial. Overall, the conversation highlights concerns about the perceived value of engineering degrees that include business coursework and the implications of longer academic paths on career readiness and financial outcomes.
kr73114
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Yeh, so which one do you think is better?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A proper engineering degree, as engineering degrees with management/business/whatever are often viewed as weaker and water down.
 
MBA later. I was having this discussion with a grad student at my uni, not so long ago.
I've been in the BEng/BComm course and he did the same course. I was discussing my growing dislike towards the business component, and he concurred, saying in hindsight, he would definitely go for just an Engineering major, with perhaps the MBA at some stage.
 
Shaun_W said:
A proper engineering degree, as engineering degrees with management/business/whatever are often viewed as weaker and water down.

At the uni I want to go in it just takes longer. Nothing is watered down because in that uni you need to take elective courses from other faculties. Under this double degree you don't need to take electives, which are not needed in the degree anyway.
 
kr73114 said:
At the uni I want to go in it just takes longer. Nothing is watered down because in that uni you need to take elective courses from other faculties. Under this double degree you don't need to take electives, which are not needed in the degree anyway.

Okay. So it takes longer, which means that you have to spend more time studying before you can graduate, which means it takes longer for you to get a wage. It's a waste of time. You'd be far better off graduating sooner and earning a wage than paying more to stay in university.
 
Shaun_W said:
Okay. So it takes longer, which means that you have to spend more time studying before you can graduate, which means it takes longer for you to get a wage. It's a waste of time. You'd be far better off graduating sooner and earning a wage than paying more to stay in university.

fair enough
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top