Engineering Dynamics - Car Striking a Barrier

AI Thread Summary
A car with a mass of 800 kg strikes a barrel barrier at a speed of 60 km/h, and the problem involves calculating the penetration distance into the barrier. The kinetic energy of the car is converted into work done against the resistance force of the barrels, which increases with penetration distance. The calculations show that the total energy loss due to the resistance force must equal the initial kinetic energy, leading to an integration of the force over the distance. The final penetration distance is determined to be approximately 2.10 meters after accounting for the energy dissipated by the barrels. The discussion highlights the importance of using correct units and understanding energy conservation principles in dynamics.
ConnorM
Messages
77
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A car, assumed to be rigid and having a mass of 800 kg, strikes a barrel-barrier installation without the driver applying the brakes. From experiments the magnitude of the force of resistance F_r, created by deforming the barrels successive, is shown as a function of the vehicle penetration, s. If the car strikes the barrier traveling at a velocity v_c = 60 km/h, determine approximately the distance s to which the car penetrates the barrier.

http://imgur.com/LYc87dW - here is a picture of my question. This has the graph of how the barrels resistance force increases with s.

Homework Equations



v_c = 60 km/h = 16.67 m/s
m = 800 kg

T (Kinetic energy) = 1/2 * mv^2

U_1->2 = ∫F ds

∑U_1->2 = T_2 - T_1

The Attempt at a Solution



Starting off I assumed that once the car had reached the distance s it will have zero kinetic energy. So my equation became

∑U_1->2 = - T_1,

∫F ds = - 1/2 *mv^2, would my bounds of integration be 0 -> s ?

I don't really know what to do, am I using the right principles here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You got it somewhat figured out. Keep in mind the signs when simplifying this:
$$E_{\text{Final}} - E_{\text{Initial}} = \int \vec{F}(\vec{s}) \cdot \text{d}\vec{s}$$
 
OK so then I would have,

∫F ds 0 -> s = - 1/2 *mv2

∫F ds 0 -> s = 111,155.56 J

So from the graph, 40 kN x 0.75m = 30 J

Then I need 111,155.56 J - 30,000 J = 81,155.56 J,

so 60 kN x s = 81,155.56 J

s = 81,155.56 J / 60 kN

s = 1.35 m, then 1.35m + 0.75m = 2.10m
 
I did something similar, but I don't get how you end up with 111,155.56 J. -1/2 (800)(60)^2 = 1,440,000. I wanted to go about it the same way as you but as I added up the separate distances, they went past the graph and still didn't get close to the amount of energy needed. Can anyone please clarify this?

... 5 seconds later I realize we use m/s not km/h in SI, after spending two hours trying to figure it out... sorry thanks anyways
 
Last edited:
ConnorM said:
OK so then I would have,

∫F ds 0 -> s = - 1/2 *mv2

∫F ds 0 -> s = 111,155.56 J

So from the graph, 40 kN x 0.75m = 30 J

Then I need 111,155.56 J - 30,000 J = 81,155.56 J,

so 60 kN x s = 81,155.56 J

s = 81,155.56 J / 60 kN

s = 1.35 m, then 1.35m + 0.75m = 2.10m
I think I'm taking the same dynamics course as you, I finished my CAP assignment yesterday so I might be able to help.

Remember Fr is opposite to the displacement therefore negative such that:

T1 + ∑U1→2 = T2
1/2mv^2 - Area = 0

Also you are measuring area so your units will be according to the graph "kN m" not "J" such that:

Area = 111155.56 N ft = 111.16 kN ft I also got "s = 2.10 m" as my final answer, so I'm assuming it's right.
 
Back
Top