bigu01
- 57
- 0
Homework Statement
It is given in the photo
Homework Equations
They are all given in the photo
The forum discussion addresses a common issue in engineering dynamics regarding the omission of weight in free body diagrams (FBDs) for blocks in a system. Specifically, the weight of block B was not included in the FBD when applying Newton's Second Law, which is a critical oversight that impacts the solution. The discussion clarifies that while the weights of both blocks are relevant, their omission does not affect the overall dynamics due to the negligible friction in the system. This highlights the importance of accurately representing forces in FBDs for correct problem-solving.
PREREQUISITESStudents and professionals in mechanical engineering, particularly those focusing on dynamics and statics, will benefit from this discussion. It is also valuable for educators teaching engineering principles related to forces and motion.
good question, they forgot to include the weight of the block B in the free body diagram. In fact, they didn't include the weight of block A in its free body diagram, although that doesn't affect the solution. But the omission of block B weight was an apparent oversight that does affect the result.bigu01 said:Homework Statement
It is given in the photo
Homework Equations
They are all given in the photo
The Attempt at a Solution
I solved exactly the same as in the solution manual, except for the FBD of the slider B, when they write the 2nd Law, they do not input the weight there, only the Tension force by the rod.Why did they do that, that was the part I did not understand. Note: For the B block they use the x-direction as vertical.
The picture is a top view. The mass of both blocks is relevant, but their weights are not.The sliders move with negligible friction in the horizontal slots shown.