Engineering Mechanics: Dynamics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the use of Normal and Tangential components versus Cylindrical (2D-Polar) coordinates in solving dynamics problems. The TA seeks clarification on when to advise students to use each coordinate system, noting that Normal and Tangential components are suitable when the particle's path is known. In contrast, Polar coordinates are suggested for curvilinear motion when the path is not defined. Participants share their experiences, indicating a preference for Normal and Tangential coordinates in practical applications. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the context of motion when choosing the appropriate coordinate system.
Pooty
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
The problem I am having isn't so much related to an exact problem but I am a TA for Dynamics and I was creating a solution set for the current homework where we are dealing with equations of motion using either Normal and Tangential Components or using Cylindrical (2D-Polar) Coordinates. I know students are going to come in and ask how they are supposed to know to use which coordinate system on a test. Maybe you guys can provide me with a better explanation but I probably would tell them that we use the Normal and Tangential components when we know the path that the particle is traveling. Polar seems to be more for solving problems of curvilinear motion when the path is not known. Can you guys please elaborate on this and maybe give me a more educated explanation? I know I am the TA and I should know this class like the back of my hand but I haven't taken it for 4 years. I don't want to look like an idiot. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well I never really used polar coordinates in my dynamics class, but I just used to use n-t coordinates when I had a particle moving on a curved path essentially.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
102
Views
7K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
512
Back
Top