Engineering physics: Which specialization? Bio-phys vs applied-phys

AI Thread Summary
Choosing a specialization for an EP degree involves three options: math, applied physics, and biophysics, with a preference for physics. The individual expresses interest in technology, space exploration, brain function, evolution, and cutting-edge innovations, while also aiming for a decent GPA. Concerns arise regarding the implications of graduate programs in the U.S., the importance of such programs for technology development, and the employment landscape for biophysics. Applied physics is suggested as a more flexible option, allowing exploration of various fields, while biophysics may lead to a more structured path, often requiring a residency in a hospital setting for roles in oncology. The discussion also touches on the employment prospects in nanotechnology, questioning its accessibility and job opportunities. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for clarity on career paths and the potential risks associated with each specialization.
Nikitin
Messages
734
Reaction score
27
Hi! The time has come to choose the specialization of my EP degree, and for this occasion I hope it's OK to make a very self-centred thread :p. Here's what I study: http://www.ntnu.edu/studies/mtfyma. The 3 choices are: math, applied physics and biophysics.

I don't think I want to specialize in mathematics (even though I find it much easier than physics), but rather some form of phyiscs. So I guess it's between biology or more technical stuff.

Under both biophysics and applied physics I can choose pretty much any concentration I want, but my problem is that I have very little knowledge of upper-level physics or what it's like. I am frankly overwhelmed by the options and unable to make a decision. So could you guys help me choose what I should specialize in?

Stuff I enjoy/am interested in:

* Technology. I have always been fascinated by the technological progress of humanity, and so this is definitely something I want to be a part of.

* Space exploration. A very interesting field - very adventurous and fascinating. I enjoy the novelty of exploration.

* How the brain works. I've always wanted to know more about it, and would be interested to see if it's possible to amplify its workings.

* Evolution. I've always found it very interesting and fundamental, and think it's cool how it can be used to optimize processes in computer science.

* Cutting-edge technology. I like ambitious goals and unexplored territory.

* Working internationally. Anywhere else than Norway.

My school is (probably) comparable to caltech or similarly strict US engineering schools when it comes to difficulty and workload, and I aim at a decent GPA (at least 3.5) when I graduate.

1) Does this mean I can get onto a graduate program in the USA in one of the fields above?
2) Is a graduate program important or more trouble than its worth if I want to develop technology?
3) How about employment? Is biophysics risky in this regard?
4) What other relevant cutting edge fields are there than the ones I listed?

Thanks for any reply :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Unless you are certain about biophysics, I would choose applied physics because it is less restrictive. It will allow you more freedom to explore your options.
 
How is it restricted? And what would my options be with biophysics?

How is the employment situation? The last thing I would want is end up as a hospital engineer or something..
 
It looks like that is a master's program, correct? With a master's in Bio-physics, usually the purpose is to begin a 2-3 year residency at a hospital in order to be qualified to work in the oncology department of a hospital. At least, that is mostly what I have seen when I have researched biomedical physics. It doesn't seem like a bad way to go, if you would like that.
 
Does anybody know about nanotechnology?

Is the field good for employment and are there many opportunities? Is it hard to get in?
 
Last edited:
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top