How Do I Calculate the Enthalpy of Isooctane at 500 K?

  • Thread starter Thread starter siddharth23
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    enthalphy
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the enthalpy of isooctane at 500 K, start from the standard state at 278 K and 1 atm. The enthalpy can be determined by calculating it up to the boiling point, then adding the latent heat of vaporization, and subsequently calculating the enthalpy to 500 K using the formula h = mCpΔT. It is important to consider whether to use a constant value for Cp or if it varies with temperature. The original question lacks specific constraints, so additional details would clarify the calculation approach. Providing the complete problem statement will help in giving a more accurate solution.
siddharth23
Messages
249
Reaction score
26
✱✱ member reminded to use the template provided ✱✱
I have to calculate the enthalpy of isooctane at 500 K.

Isooctane is a liquid at room temperature and whenever enthalpy is to be calculated, it is from the standard state (278 K temperataure, 1 atm pressure).

Do I calculate enthalpy upto boiling point, then use latent heat of vaporization and from that point calculate enthalpy upto 500 K using h = mCpΔT ? And if so, do I use the same value of Cp throughout?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What's the question say? Is it specific? Free form? Approximate?
 
It says to calculate the enthalpy of isooctane at 500 K on a kJ/kmol basis
 
You haven't been given any constraints beyond units, so you are free to do as you wish.
 
You haven't given the exact and complete problem statement.
 
Can you post the question again with more information ?
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top