Equal flow distribution to 3x3 grid

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the challenge of achieving equal flow distribution to a 3x3 grid from outer points, drawing parallels to traffic flow problems. Participants explore the concept of "splitting" flow lines geometrically, suggesting that while it works in certain configurations, it becomes complex due to varying distances to grid points. The conversation highlights the ambiguity in defining "flow rate" and how it can differ across mediums like water or electricity. There's a consensus that while geometric progression can be applied, the distance from outer points complicates equal distribution. Ultimately, the focus remains on finding a geometric solution to this flow distribution problem.
syphex
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
This may be more of a math problem; it arose out of my curiosity of manipulating LED matrices and reminds me of a traffic flow problem, but I am sure it can model a variety of applications. Its not a homework problem but would probably make a good one!

You have a 3x3 grid of points, each point must be provided with an equal amount of flow from one of the outer points. I thought you could "split" the lines from the outer point for 2, 4, 8 (flow in = flow out and the flow is being halved each time), but this only seems to work for a 2x4 configuration, since otherwise the paths to the source would be different and hence flow rate would be effected.

Is this possible? Any advice?

Thanks in advance any help is greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Flow" of what? What determines flow rate? How do you define "flow rate of a point"?
you could "split" the lines from the outer point for 2, 4, 8
What does that mean?
 
The flow from any arbitary point except for the middle must be distributed equally to the remaining 8 points. Water, electricity, it doesn't matter the point is it must be done geometrically. The actual flow rate doesn't matter, only the distribution.

As for the split.. I simply mean if you split a wire for example into two, and then those two into two, you get four, and then 8, and so on. Simple geometric progression there. But how can you link that to the other points when the distance to any point from an outer point varies by distance.
 
There is no well-defined "flow at a point", neither in electricity nor for water. You can consider flow through a surface, or along a pipe/wire.

As for the split.. I simply mean if you split a wire for example into two, and then those two into two, you get four, and then 8, and so on. Simple geometric progression there. But how can you link that to the other points when the distance to any point from an outer point varies by distance.
Distance does not matter for electricity.

You can split a line into 3 parts, and split all 3 parts into 3 parts each afterwards. I don't see the issue.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
I don't need cloth simulation. I need to simulate clothing meshes. Made of triangles and I need an answer that someone with High School math can understand. I am actually using the time it takes for someone to answer to create a model with less geometry than the one I have been using. I want clothing that can be removed on a model that will be animated. I don't need stretching or wrinkles on my meshes, I just need gravity. I have an idea of how I could do it, but I don't know how to apply...
Back
Top