Equation of Continuity - Flow rate through an artery

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a homework problem involving the flow rate of blood through arteries of different radii. The user expresses confusion over their answer compared to classmates and seeks validation of their calculations. The solution involves using the equation of continuity, A1v1 = A2v2, and calculating areas based on the given radii. A suggestion is made to use a more precise value for π to avoid rounding errors in future calculations. The user is reassured that their result appears correct, emphasizing the importance of precision in numerical constants.
Kate L
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm really confused by this question, as it is different than the examples we did in class. I've compared my answer with a few classmates and I'm getting a different one, so I'm not sure if I've done it wrong or if they have. I'd really just like to know if I am on the right track! Thank you :)

1. Homework Statement

Blood flows at 0.465 cm/sec through an artery with an inside radius of 2.85 mm. What is the flow speed in another section where the artery radius increases to 4.35 mm? Round final answer to 3 significant figures.

Givens:
v1= 0.465 cm/sec
r1 = 2.85 mm
r2 = 4.35 mm

Homework Equations


A1v1=A2v2
A=3.14(r)2

The Attempt at a Solution


Convert v1 = 0.465 cm/sec to 0.00465 m/sec
Convert r1 = 2.85 mm to 0.00285 m
Convert r2 = 4.35 mm to 0.00435 m
Find A1→ A1=3.14(0.00285)2 = 2.550465x10-5
Find A2→ A2=3.14(0.00435)2 = 5.941665x10-5

A1v1 = A2v2
v2 = (A1v1) ÷ A2
= [2.550465x10-5(0.00465)] ÷ 5.941665x10-5
= 1.996016647x10-3
= 2.00x10-3 m/sec
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Kate L, Welcome to Physics Forums.

You've done all right, the result looks good.

One thing you might keep in mind when using numerical values for constants like ##\pi## is to use more digits than the required number of significant figures. Otherwise rounding errors can creep into your results. The value of ##\pi## that you've used: 3.14, is already rounded (or truncated) to three significant figures. A better choice would be to use something like 3.1416. For this problem it doesn't make a difference because its influence cancels out when you divide one area by the other.
 
Thank you, I will keep that in mind!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top