Equation of motion for the system, and determine the frequen

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the equation of motion for a block suspended by springs and determining the frequency of small oscillations. The net force acting on the block is expressed as F = m##\ddot x## = -x(2k + mg/l), which leads to the equation of motion. The frequency is calculated using f = ω/2π, where ω is derived from the equation of motion. Participants emphasize the importance of careful algebraic manipulation and reasoning throughout the calculations. The conversation highlights the need for clarity in each step to avoid errors and achieve the correct final expression.
Chhung
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


upload_2016-10-1_2-29-12.png

A small block of mass m is suspended from the top of a box by a mass-less string of length L. Two identical springs, each with spring constant k, extend from the block to the sides of the box, as shown in the diagram to the right. The length of the springs is such that they are not stretched when the block is in its equilibrium position.Find the equation of motion for the system, and determine the frequency of small oscillations. Briefly explain your reasoning.
Hint: Think about what the restoring force on the block would be, if springs were not there. For small x, this force is approximately proportional to x. You should make this small-x approximation, before you add the force due to the springs.

Homework Equations


F= -mgx/l
F=-kx? or F= 1/2 kx^2?

The Attempt at a Solution


so far, I got
Fnet = -kx+ (-kx) -(mgx/l)

mX= -x (kx+mg/l)
ω= √( (kx+ mg/l) /m)
f= ω/2 π
= √( (kx+ mg/l) /4π^2 m)

but they seems very wrong...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What makes you think this "seems very wrong"?

Please show your reasoning along with your working.
ie: what does this mean: "mX= -x (kx+mg/l)" and where did it come from?
 
  • Like
Likes Chhung
Chhung said:
Fnet = -kx+ (-kx) -(mgx/l)
Good so far.
Chhung said:
mX= -x (kx+mg/l)
Not sure what you have done here. I'm guessing X stands for ##\ddot x##, but you had two kx terms and now you have one kx2 term instead.
 
  • Like
Likes Chhung
Simon Bridge said:
What makes you think this "seems very wrong"?

Please show your reasoning along with your working.
ie: what does this mean: "mX= -x (kx+mg/l)" and where did it come from?

yes, that X means ##\ddot x##
so F= m##\ddot x##= -x (k+mg/l)?

f= ω/2 π
= √( (k+ mg/l) /4π^2 m)
is it all done? I can't go any furhter after this
 
Last edited:
haruspex said:
Good so far.

Not sure what you have done here. I'm guessing X stands for , but you had two kx terms and now you have one kx2 term instead.
Chhung said:
yes, that X means ##\ddot x##
so F= m##\ddot x##= -x (k+mg/l)?

f= ω/2 π
= √( (k+ mg/l) /4π^2 m)
is it all done? I can't go any furhter after this

Sorry
it should be
F= m##\ddot x##= -x (2k+mg/l)?

f= ω/2 π
= √( (k+ mg/l) /2π^2 m)
 
Chhung said:
Sorry
it should be
F= m##\ddot x##= -x (2k+mg/l)?

f= ω/2 π
= √( (k+ mg/l) /2π^2 m)
You are still making algebraic errors. 2k+mg/l cannot easily turn into k+mg/l.
 
  • Like
Likes Chhung
haruspex said:
You are still making algebraic errors. 2k+mg/l cannot easily turn into k+mg/l.
because I put 2π into the "√" so it turn to √(4π^2)
then √( (2k+ mg/l) /4π^2 m) => √( (k+ mg/l) /2π^2 m) isn't it?
 
You have been asked to do this:
Find the equation of motion for the system, and determine the frequency of small oscillations. Briefly explain your reasoning.
... you are having difficulty with algebra and the bit in bold.

The way to minimize algebra errors is to do the algebra one step at a time... and include little notes about why you did each step. That is what "Breifly explain your reasoning" means (in this context).

So let's see: that ##m\ddot x = -(2k + mg/l)x## you got, is that the equation of motion you were asked for? If so then say so.

How do you get from there to your expression for ##\omega =##?? What is your reasoning?

Having got an expression for ##\omega## you proceeded to ##f=\omega /2\pi## and explained your final expression thus:
I put 2π into the "√" so it turn to √(4π^2)
then √( (2k+ mg/l) /4π^2 m) => √( (k+ mg/l) /2π^2 m) isn't it?
No it isn't. Do it one step at a time...
... next step is either to separate the numerator so you have two fractions or shift the "2" outside the parentheses in the numerator, or recognize that the numerator is itself a fraction and put that fraction over a common denominator... there's a lot of choice but you need to pick one, like this:
-- separating the fraction:
$$\sqrt{\frac{2k+mg/l}{4\pi^2m}} = \sqrt{ \frac{2k}{4\pi^2m}+\frac{mg/l}{4\pi^2m}} = \cdots$$
-- putting the "2" outside the parentheses:
$$\sqrt{\frac{2k+mg/l}{4\pi^2m}} = \sqrt{ \frac{2(k+mg/2l)}{4\pi^2m}} = \cdots$$
-- common denominator
$$\sqrt{\frac{2k+mg/l}{4\pi^2m}} =\sqrt{\frac{2kl+mg}{l}\frac{1}{4\pi^2m}}=\cdots$$

... pick one and finish the algebra.
Don't forget to show your reasoning as you go.
 
  • Like
Likes Chhung
Simon Bridge said:
You have been asked to do this: ... you are having difficulty with algebra and the bit in bold.

The way to minimize algebra errors is to do the algebra one step at a time... and include little notes about why you did each step. That is what "Breifly explain your reasoning" means (in this context).

So let's see: that ##m\ddot x = -(2k + mg/l)x## you got, is that the equation of motion you were asked for? If so then say so.

How do you get from there to your expression for ##\omega =##?? What is your reasoning?

Having got an expression for ##\omega## you proceeded to ##f=\omega /2\pi## and explained your final expression thus:
No it isn't. Do it one step at a time...
... next step is either to separate the numerator so you have two fractions or shift the "2" outside the parentheses in the numerator, or recognize that the numerator is itself a fraction and put that fraction over a common denominator... there's a lot of choice but you need to pick one, like this:
-- separating the fraction:
$$\sqrt{\frac{2k+mg/l}{4\pi^2m}} = \sqrt{ \frac{2k}{4\pi^2m}+\frac{mg/l}{4\pi^2m}} = \cdots$$
-- putting the "2" outside the parentheses:
$$\sqrt{\frac{2k+mg/l}{4\pi^2m}} = \sqrt{ \frac{2(k+mg/2l)}{4\pi^2m}} = \cdots$$
-- common denominator
$$\sqrt{\frac{2k+mg/l}{4\pi^2m}} =\sqrt{\frac{2kl+mg}{l}\frac{1}{4\pi^2m}}=\cdots$$

... pick one and finish the algebra.
Don't forget to show your reasoning as you go.
oh yes! I have to factor that "2" out first
thank you!
 
Back
Top