Equation of motion of open string with Dirchlet b.c

benbenny
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Fashioned after the derivation of the equation of motion for a string with Neumann b.c in Zwiebach's a first course of string theory, I have derived the very similar equation using Dirchlet b.c. My result, in natural units, is
X^{\mu}(\tau,\sigma)=X_{0}^{\mu}-2\alpha' p^{\mu}\sigma +\sum_{n\ne 0}\left(\frac{\sqrt{2\alpha'}}{\sqrt{n}}\sin(n\sigma) a_{n}^{\mu}e^{-in\tau} \right)

Im having a hard time understanding the significance of the term
2\alpha' p^{\mu}\sigma .

From comparing this result to the Neumann b.c derived string, I understand that this term signifies translational momentum of the center of mass of the string in spacetime. Since this string has fixed endpoints, my intuitive guess would be that it would have zero translational momentum. Further I am baffled by the sigma dependence of this term which indicates that this momentum term is zero at one endpoint of the string, and maximized at the other end. I am lost on this, any clarification would be much appreciated.

Thanks.

Ben
 
Physics news on Phys.org
benbenny said:
Fashioned after the derivation of the equation of motion for a string with Neumann b.c in Zwiebach's a first course of string theory, I have derived the very similar equation using Dirchlet b.c. My result, in natural units, is
X^{\mu}(\tau,\sigma)=X_{0}^{\mu}-2\alpha' p^{\mu}\sigma +\sum_{n\ne 0}\left(\frac{\sqrt{2\alpha'}}{\sqrt{n}}\sin(n\sigma) a_{n}^{\mu}e^{-in\tau} \right)

Im having a hard time understanding the significance of the term
2\alpha' p^{\mu}\sigma .

From comparing this result to the Neumann b.c derived string, I understand that this term signifies translational momentum of the center of mass of the string in spacetime. Since this string has fixed endpoints, my intuitive guess would be that it would have zero translational momentum. Further I am baffled by the sigma dependence of this term which indicates that this momentum term is zero at one endpoint of the string, and maximized at the other end. I am lost on this, any clarification would be much appreciated.

Thanks.

Ben

Anyone know why I am getting no answer for this one? Should I post it in the beyond the standard model forum?

Cheers.
 
Maybe ask one of the mentors/moderators to move it... you're probably more likely to get an answer there since this is beyond the level of what usually winds up in the HW forum. (And you're asking more of a conceptual question than "how do I do this problem" anyway :wink:)
 
Yeah, who wants to study all the string nonsense anyway? :p
 
Ok. Just thought that since its undergrad level question...but ill ask a moderator. thanks
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top