Equation of Tangent Line for a 2D Curve

  • Thread starter Thread starter ArcanaNoir
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curve Tangent
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the equation of the tangent line to a curve defined by the equation (x^2-y^2)(x^2+y^2)=15 at a specific point (2,1). Participants are exploring the transition from a three-dimensional perspective to a two-dimensional context.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the applicability of the tangent plane formula from three dimensions to the two-dimensional curve scenario. There are attempts to utilize the gradient and evaluate it at the given point. Questions arise about the relationship between the gradient and the curve, as well as the nature of normal and tangent vectors.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on using the gradient to find the normal vector, while others are exploring the implications of normal vectors and their relationship to tangent lines. There is an ongoing exploration of different methods, including parametrization and derivatives.

Contextual Notes

Participants express confusion regarding the transition between different dimensions and the terminology used in their coursework. There is mention of imposed homework constraints and the complexity introduced by the professor's approach to the topic.

ArcanaNoir
Messages
778
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


"Find the equation of the plane tangent to the surface (x^2-y^2)(x^2+y^2)=15 at the point (2,1)"

If only it really were a plane and a surface, I could do that. I have a formula for that. Unfortunately, this is a curve and I'm looking for tangent line.

Homework Equations



In three dimensions, the formula for the equation of the tangent plane to the surface z=f(x,y) at the point P(x_0,y_0,z_0) is z-z_0=f_x(x_0,y_0)(x-x_0)+f_y(x_0,y_0)(y-y_0)

where f_a is the partial derivative of f wrt a.

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, pretending it's in three variables, I can do
f_x=4x^3
f_y=-4y^3

z-z_0=f_x(2,1)(x-2)+f_y(2,1)(y-1)
z-z_0=32(x-2)-4(y-1)

So, how do I repair this situation/make the formula work in two dimensions/try something else?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm afraid you equation is not of the form z=f(x,y).
If you want to compare it with a 3D case, it's of the form g(x,y,z)=0.

So your formula won't work.
Do you have other methods available?
 
I can not thank you enough for all your help! I really need to start paying you ;)

I can use anything through vector calculus. Something about the gradient? I think I might be supposed to take the gradient and then evaluate at the point. Does that sound reasonable?
 
:)

Yes, the gradient sounds reasonable.
But what would you get?
 
well, the gradient is 4x^3i-4y^3j isn't it?
 
Yes, it is.
 
Well how do I evaluate that at a point? Plug in the x and y values?
If so, I get 32i-4j
 
Yes.
This is a vector.
Can you say anything about its direction and how it relates to the curve?
 
Is the gradient normal to the curve perhaps? I can't find it in my calc book.
 
  • #10
Yes, it is.
 
  • #11
Okay so now I just need a line normal to the normal.

How do I make a vector that is perpendicular to 32i-4j ?
 
  • #12
You don't need to.

Suppose you have a line given by h(x,y)=ax+by-c=0.
What would its gradient be?EDIT: to answer your question, a perpendicular vector would have a dot product that comes out as zero.
 
  • #13
It's gradient would be ai+bj.
But, if a gradient is normal to the curve, don't I need to find the line perpendicular to the gradient? oh.. wait, for the equation of a line, do I use a point and a normal vector? I think I do... *looking up*

[EDIT] no no, I see you use a parallel vector. So, what do I do now?

[EDIT] now I'm reading about normal vectors and equations of lines and checking my notes...
 
  • #14
A line is also a curve.

If you have 2 curves that both have a normal vector that point in the same direction, wouldn't they have to be tangential to each other?
 
  • #15
I'm confused. I have my curve and I have my normal. I don't have another curve.
 
  • #16
The parametric representation of a curve (or a surface), has a (partial) derivative that yields a vector tangential to the curve (or surface).

The equation of a curve (or surface) has a gradient that is normal to the curve (or surface).
 
  • #17
ArcanaNoir said:
I'm confused. I have my curve and I have my normal. I don't have another curve.

The line given by by h(x,y)=ax+by-c=0 is also a curve.
Its gradient is normal to the line.
 
  • #18
So are you saying I need to parametrize instead and take the partial derivative?
 
  • #19
I'm going to call it quits for tonight, I still have to iron clothes, and rest! I'll pick this back up tomorrow. Thank you so much for your time tonight!
 
  • #20
Okay. Thanks for telling me.
See you later.
 
  • #21
I rearranged the equation to y=f(x) and I took the derivative and found the tangent line thusly. I don't have my notes with me now but I believe it was y=8x-15. Problem solved. Thanks ILS :)
 
  • #22
Yep. That is the right answer.

You can do it two ways: with the derivative of a parametric curve as you have apparently done now.

Or alternatively with the gradient of an equation, which you had almost completed. ;)
 
  • #23
I don't think it would have been so bad if my professor hadn't written words for one dimension and then equations for another. >_< Silly prof.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K