Equations of motion of a particle over a cylinder+conserved quantities

fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,928
Reaction score
272

Homework Statement


I must determine the conserved quantities+the equations of motion (of the trajectory in fact) of a particle over the surface of a cylinder.

Homework Equations


Lagrangian and Euler-Lagrange's equations.

The Attempt at a Solution


I've found the Lagrangian of the particle to be L=\frac{m}{2}(r^2\dot \phi ^2 + \dot z^2).
Since the Lagrangian doesn't depend explicitly on \phi nor z, the generalized momenta conjugate are conserved (I'm currently having under my eyes Goldstein's book, 1st edition, page 49).
So I can already answer this part of the problem, P_\phi=k_1 and P_z=k_2.
By intuition I know that the angular momentum is conserved and the speed of the particle along the z axis is constant.
I have a problem however with the Lagrange's equations.
For the generalized coordinate q=r I have that \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot r}=0 and \frac{\partial L}{\partial r}=m r \dot \phi ^2.
This gives me the first equation of motion, namely r\dot \phi ^2=0. Since r\neq 0 (I'm dealing with a cylinder), \dot \phi =0.
Similarly, I get for \phi: \underbrace{2 \dot r \dot \phi}_{=0} + r \ddot \phi =0 \Rightarrow \ddot \phi =0 which isn't a surprise since I already knew that \dot \phi=0.
I also get \ddot z=0.
So... the motion equations are \dot \phi =0 and \ddot z=0?
I think I made a mistake. If I integrate them I get \phi = \text{ constant} which is obviously wrong.
Hmm I'm confused about what I must do.
Edit: It seems that if I hadn't make any mistake, the motion equations should give me the information I already know: \dot \phi = constant and \dot z = constant. By the way I don't see my mistake for the Lagrange equation regarding \phi.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The particle moves over the surface of a cylinder, so r is not a coordinate, but a constant, the radius of the cylinder. The only coordinates are phi and z. Do not derive with respect to r.
If r were a variable too, you should include the term 1/2 m r(dot) ^2 into the kinetic energy.


ehild
 
is there no gravitational force acting on this particle. And since r is constant you cannot consider it to be one of the D.O.F and you can't derive the equation that gives you 0 angular velocity
 
Thank you very much guys, I wasn't aware I shouldn't have derived 3 equations of motion because one of the generalized coordinates was a constant.
So I'm left with \ddot \phi = \ddot z =0 which means that both \dot \phi and \dot z are constants.
I realize that \dot \phi =0 means that the angular momentum of the particle with respect to the z-axis is conserved. While the z component of the linear momentum of the particle is also conserved.
Integrating the equations of motion, I reach that of course as you said, r(t)=K. Also \phi(t)=c_2t+c_4 and z(t)=c_1t+c_3.
Thus, \vec r (t)= \begin{bmatrix} K\\ c_2t+c_4 \\ c_1t+c_3 \end{bmatrix}.

Is my answer correct considering they asked for the trajectory?
 
It should be OK if there is no force except the constraints.

ehild
 
Thanks for the confirmation. Problem solved.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top