Equilibrium between 1 stationary mass and 1 orbiting mass

  • Thread starter Thread starter cm_student
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equilibrium Mass
AI Thread Summary
To determine the equilibrium distance between a stationary mass and an orbiting mass, one must equate the centripetal force to the gravitational force. The gravitational force formula requires knowledge of the masses and the distance between them, which is not provided. The discussion highlights that there is no universal distance for two celestial bodies to maintain equilibrium, suggesting that the distance could theoretically be infinite. Additionally, the orbital period is necessary to calculate the distance accurately. The conversation emphasizes the complexity of the problem and the need for more specific parameters to derive a solution.
cm_student
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I am trying to find the easiest and simplest way of calculating the distance that two celestial bodies would need to be apart, in order for those celestial bodies to never get closer or further away from each other. I have the values of the mass, density, radius, volume and gravity of the two celestial bodies, is it possible to use the values I have to work out how far apart they would need to be to remain in a state of equilibrium? The smaller mass(M1) is orbiting around the larger mass(M2).


I tried to use the following equation, but to no avail because I neither have the gravitational force(F) nor do I have the radial distance (r) between the masses.

Newton's law of gravity: F = (M1 * M2) / r^12

I am looking for an equation that will help me to solve this problem for all planetary bodies.
Thanks for any and all help. Please keep answers as simple as possible :D
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You'd need to find where the centripetal force = Gravitational force.

But you would need something like the orbital period to get the distance.

EDIT: Use the original thread where ehild is helping you
 
Last edited:
cm_student said:
I am trying to find the easiest and simplest way of calculating the distance that two celestial bodies would need to be apart, in order for those celestial bodies to never get closer or further away from each other.

Your question has not much sense in the language of Physics. I tried to explain the situation which is real and seemed to relate to your problem.

The answer to your question is that there is no such universal distance for the case of two bodies but infinity.

ehild
 
I sincerely thank you for trying to help ehild. At least you tried :)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top