Equilibrium of a Homogeneous Dice on Horizontal Rods: Finding the Critical Angle

  • Thread starter Thread starter jcdenton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dice Equilibrium
AI Thread Summary
A homogeneous die rests on two parallel rods, and the problem involves determining the angles of equilibrium given a friction coefficient of 0.2. The die is in equilibrium at 45 degrees, but additional angles exist due to friction. Key calculations involve determining the distances from the die's center of mass to each rod, which affect the weight distribution and torques. The discussion highlights the need for precise geometry and lever arm calculations to find these additional angles. Continued exploration of these calculations is necessary for a complete solution.
jcdenton
Hi !

I've been working on the following problem for quite some time now and I just can't figure out how to do it:
A homogeneous dice, whose edges have a length of a, is situated on two horizontal, thin, rigid rods. The rods are parallel to each other and are installed on the same height above the ground. Each of the rods is also parallel to one side of the dice. The coefficient of friction, μ, equals 0.2. For which angles α is the dice in a state of equilibrium ?
It is clear that the dice is in such a state for an angle α of 45°. However, due to friction, there must be additional angles, which are slightly bigger and smaller than 45°. But I do not know how to find these angles. I have tried to draw a diagram of all the forces involved in the problem, but I don't know which torques I need to consider and at which points I need to draw them.
It would be very nice if someone could help me solve this problem.

Thank you very much

Sebastian
 

Attachments

  • physik.jpg
    physik.jpg
    7.6 KB · Views: 544
Physics news on Phys.org
Some preliminary geometry

I did a bunch of triangulation and found two things you need:

1.) If the center of mass of the square is traced down to where it crosses the line between the two pegs, the distance from the left peg to that crossing is

(L + (L - L COS a) COS a) - (2 ^ .5 * L / 2 * SIN (a + PI/4))

And the distance from the right peg to that crossing is (L - distance to left peg).

I don't know how much that expression can be simplified--I didn't even try.

You need those distances to find how much of the weight rests on each peg--it's not an equal split except when "a" is 45 degrees.

I'm going to call the distance from the left peg to the crossing X and the distance from the right peg to the crossing L - X so that I don't have to say that whole thing out again.

2.) First, the distance from the center of the square to the crossing is

(2 ^ .5 * L / 2 * SIN (a + PI/4)) - L * COS a SIN a

I will call that distance Y.

The distance from the left peg to the center of mass is therefore

(X ^ 2 + Y ^ 2) ^ .5

and the distance from the right peg to the center of mass is

((L - X) ^ 2 + Y ^ 2) ^ .5


Those two distances are your lever arms.
 
Hi !

@Bartholomew: Thank you very much for your efforts. Even though I haven't yet completely understood your calculations, they surely have provided me with a clou of how this problem might be solved. I'll continue working on it.

Thank you again

Sebastian
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'A scenario of non-uniform circular motion'
(All the needed diagrams are posted below) My friend came up with the following scenario. Imagine a fixed point and a perfectly rigid rod of a certain length extending radially outwards from this fixed point(it is attached to the fixed point). To the free end of the fixed rod, an object is present and it is capable of changing it's speed(by thruster say or any convenient method. And ignore any resistance). It starts with a certain speed but say it's speed continuously increases as it goes...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top