Equilibrium of forces acting at a point

AI Thread Summary
An object can be in equilibrium while moving if there is no net force acting on it, as stated by Newton's 1st law. For a ring with weights, equilibrium is achieved when the vector sum of forces and torques equals zero. Estimating uncertainties in force and angle measurements depends on the accuracy of the measuring instruments used. A tilted table introduces systematic errors affecting measurements, rather than random errors. The units of sine and cosine are dimensionless, and while certain trigonometric formulas apply differently in radians and degrees, both units serve to measure angles.
changd
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
1. can an object be moving and still be in equilibrium?
2. consider a ring with a pin in the center that's not connected to the ring. three weights are attached to the ring at different angles and are hanging from the side of the apparatus where the ring lies. what criteria will decide when the forces on the ring are in equilibrium?
3. draw a set of three vectors whose sum is zero
4. how will you estimate the uncertainty of each force acting on the ring?
5. how will you estimate the uncertainty of each angle measurement?
6. how much error will be introduced if the table is not level? how could you test this empirically?
7. what are the units of sine and cosine? does your answer depend on the units of the angle (degrees or radians)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. Yes, provided by "equilibrium", you mean no net force acting on it. Newton's 1st law covers this.

2. It's hard to visualise what you are describing here. But if a system is in equilibrium it either moves with a constant velocity or not at all. Rotational equilibrium means that there isn't any net torque about any chosen point.

3. That's pretty simple. Think of a closed shape consisting of three lines.

4. Uncertainty is related to measurement, so unless you tell us what instruments are used to measure the force and how you measure them, your question makes no sense.

5. Again it depends on the level of accuracy of your measuring instrument.

6. Don't know what you mean here. The apparatus is set up on the table, but what has this got to do with measurement errors? If the tilted table affects the results it would be a systematic error and not a random error. When someone asks "How much error/uncertainty is given in the results", they are usually referring to random errors, not systematic ones.

7. Certain trigo formulas work in radians but not degrees, but apart from that there is no difference between the two. The units of degrees are well, degrees and you should be able to determine the units of radian measurement by dimensional analysis.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top