Equilibrium sum of forces question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a homework question related to equilibrium, specifically involving distance and weight. The original poster seeks validation for their solution approach, expressing concerns about its simplicity. A response indicates that their method is incorrect and suggests considering the tension in the rope to sum the forces on the sliding collar. The poster acknowledges the complexity they added to the problem and mentions recalculating the angle and distance involved. The conversation highlights the challenges of starting complex physics problems and the importance of correctly applying equilibrium principles.
fableblue
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Equilibrium question with distance and weight

Homework Statement


Would someone be able to tell me if my attempt at this is correct. It seems too easy. If it is not could you help?


Homework Equations


Sum of the forces in the X direction
Sum of the forces in the Y direction
Mid point = DF

The Attempt at a Solution


attached
 

Attachments

  • Equilibrium001.jpg
    Equilibrium001.jpg
    32.8 KB · Views: 432
  • Equilibrium002.jpg
    Equilibrium002.jpg
    22 KB · Views: 456
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I am just seeing if i am on the right path. A simple yes or no would be enough.
Thank you
 
No, it's not quite right. Hint: What's the tension in the rope? Then you can sum the forces on the sliding collar.
 
Thanks Doc Al
I will look at it again when i get home from work.
 
I was going about this the wrong way, making it too complicated.
1st what I did was get the angle where the rope attached to collar A and the rod, γ = cos-1 (40/50), γ=36.87 ; the to find x I just used tan36.87= 20/x  x = 20/tan36.87 so the result is x = 26.67in.
I find that I over think a problem too much but I guess that is because I find it hard to find a starting point.

Thanks
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top