Equilibrium under parallel forces

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the maximum overhang, x, of brick C on a table while maintaining equilibrium for three identical bricks A, B, and C. The analysis involves calculating torques around specific points, particularly the edge of the table and the bottom-left corner of brick B. The derived equations suggest that the maximum value of x is 16.8 cm. There is a consideration of horizontal forces acting on brick A due to brick C's slight overturning, although friction is not mentioned in the problem. The solution emphasizes the importance of torque balance for maintaining equilibrium in this scenario.
th4450
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Three identical bricks A , B and C are placed on the edge of a table as shown. Each brick is of length 24 cm and C overhangs the table by x cm. What is the maximum value of x so that the system can still be in equilibrium?

Y-1.jpg



Any idea?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!
We aren't supposed to offer help until you post an attempt, but can make an exception on your first post. When it just begins to fall, C will turn ever so slightly with the edge of the table as fulcum. In turn, B will tip ever so slightly with its left end as fulcrum. You need to figure out the torques on B and C, which are related by the force B exerts on C.
Setting the torque for C equal to zero (just at the point of rotating), solve for x.
 
Oops thanks.. Sorry for not following the template. :redface:

So, first take moment at the bottom-left corner of B.
CFB(18) - mgB(12) = 0
CFB = BFC = (2/3)(mgB) (Action-reaction pair)

Then take moment at the edge of the table.
BFC(24-x) - mgC(x-12) = 0
(2/3)(mgB)(24-x) = mgC(x-12)
∵mgB = mgC
∴xmax = 16.8

But is it necessary to consider the horizontal force acting on A by C? As C slightly overturns, it will push A slightly towards the left.
 
Looks good! The question doesn't mention a coefficient of friction, so I doubt if you are expected to include the forces of the brick pushing sideways.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top