How Does a Rod's Angle Change in an Accelerating Car?

AI Thread Summary
In an accelerating car, a uniform thin rod pivoted at one end experiences a change in angle due to the car's acceleration. The equilibrium angle \Theta between the rod and the car's top can be determined by equating the fictitious force acting on the rod with its weight, leading to a straightforward solution. For small displacements \Phi from equilibrium, the rod's motion tends to return to its equilibrium position, although the vertical motion remains consistent due to the small angle approximation. The discussion highlights the challenges of solving the differential equation for part B, indicating a lack of familiarity with such methods among participants. Overall, the thread emphasizes the relationship between acceleration and the rod's angle in a dynamic system.
davesface
Messages
97
Reaction score
2
A uniform thin rod of length L and mass M is pivoted at one end. The pivot is attached to the top of a car accelerating at rate A.

a.) What is the equilibrium value of the angle \Theta between the rod and the top of the car?

Honestly, I'm not entirely sure what the question even wants me to find. Playing the problem out in my mind, it seems like the angle would just continue to increase at a constant rate as the car accelerates with a constant rate A, but clearly this is not the case.

b.) Suppose that the rod is displaced a small angle \Phi from equilibrium. What is its motion for small \Phi?

I would assume that the motion would be towards equilibrium, although the vertical component of motion for the rod itself should still be the same, as the approximation cos\Phi=1 should hold for small values of \Phi.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi davesface! :smile:

Let's do a.) first …
davesface said:
A uniform thin rod of length L and mass M is pivoted at one end. The pivot is attached to the top of a car accelerating at rate A.

a.) What is the equilibrium value of the angle \Theta between the rod and the top of the car?

Hint: in equilibrium, the acceleration of the end of the rod will be the same as the acceleration of the car.

So use good ol' Newton's second law :smile:
 
OK, part A was a lot easier than I thought, and all I did was set the fictional force backwards equal to the force of weight and solve for theta.

Turns out that part B would've required us to solve a differential equation, which no one knows how to do. Thanks for the response, though.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top