What is the equivalent resistance across points a and b?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the equivalent resistance across points a and b in a circuit, specifically a Wheatstone bridge configuration. Participants mention using Kirchhoff's laws to set up simultaneous equations but express difficulty in solving them. Suggestions include redrawing the circuit for clarity, applying Thevenin's theorem, and transforming delta configurations to Y shapes for simplification. The conversation highlights various methods to approach the problem, emphasizing the importance of understanding series and parallel resistor combinations. Ultimately, the thread underscores the complexity of the circuit and the need for different strategies to find the solution.
Piyu
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
1. find the equivalent resistance across points a and b





The Attempt at a Solution



I've used kirchhoff junction and loop rule to get a whole chunk of simultaneous equations but i can't seem to lay the finisher.

Assigning I_1 to I_4 in the clock wise manner starting from the 5 ohms resistor, and I_5 to the middle 2 ohms resistor. V = potential difference between a and b.

V=5I5+4I2=3I4+3I5
I=I1+I4=I2+I5

Ill end up with R=V/I = 15V/(8V-15I5-12I2. and here I am pretty much stuck with no way to change the remaining 2 to equations of V
 

Attachments

  • Circuit.png
    Circuit.png
    4.6 KB · Views: 450
Physics news on Phys.org
Parallel resistors are inversely proportional. Series resistors are directly proportional.

Parallel
\frac{1}{R_{total}} = \frac{1}{R_1} + \frac{1}{R_2}

Series
R_{total} = R_1 + R_2

Redraw the diagram to make it easier to distinguish between series and parallel.
 
I don't think we can approach it from using the resistor sums for series and parallel because i can't seem to redraw it in any way that i can use the 2 forumulas. Maybe, too much staring at it has made me cock-eyed :P
 
You're right this is an annoying circuit. It is a wheatstone bridge. But you can use Thevenize it to make it simpler. Should end up as
R_{total} = \frac{1}{\frac{1}{3 \Omega} + \frac{1}{3 \Omega}} + \frac{1}{\frac{1}{5 \Omega} + \frac{1}{4 \Omega}} + 2 \Omega

Just google wheatstone bridge and you should find a decent explanation.
 
Obviously there are several methods available for approaching this problem. One might, for example, place a 1V voltage source across a-b and write the Kirchoff loop equations for the three loops, solving for the current through the source voltage. V/I gives your resistance.

Another approach is to transform one of the ∆ shaped configurations of resistors to a Y sharped one, thus allowing one to proceed with the usual parallel and serial simplifications down to a single resistor.

Here's a http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_1/chpt_10/13.html" .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top