Equivalent resistors in resistor networks

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a problem related to equivalent resistors in a resistor network, focusing on the methods for simplifying complex circuits. It includes elements of homework assistance and technical reasoning.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses uncertainty about their approach to solving the resistor network problem, indicating that their final answer does not match expectations.
  • Another participant suggests eliminating resistanceless branches and simplifying the circuit, proposing that there may be parts of the circuit with no voltages or currents.
  • A later reply provides a systematic method for labeling nodes in the circuit, explaining how to refer to resistances between nodes and emphasizing the importance of recognizing electrically equivalent nodes.
  • This participant also outlines a step-by-step approach to calculate equivalent resistances, including specific calculations for parallel and series combinations.
  • A final post expresses gratitude for the explanation and indicates that the participant is new to the topic and finds the guidance helpful for future homework.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the initial approach to the problem, as one expresses confusion while another provides a different method for simplification. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to the problem.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the clarity of the circuit diagram referenced, and assumptions about the electrical equivalence of nodes may not be universally accepted without further clarification.

Lildon
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I would think you would do well to first of all eliminate all the resistanceless branches and fuse the nodes connected by them.

I think you then may find there is a part of the circuit with no voltages and no currents. The fact I think so is far from a guarantee so I am within the rules saying so. Anyway look to simplify the circuit in this way.
 
Lildon said:

Homework Statement


http://i134.photobucket.com/albums/q100/megajette2/Resistornetwork.png

Homework Equations


parallel resistors share the same nodes or terminals and simplify to (a*b)/(a+b).
in series resistors values are added.

The Attempt at a Solution


http://i134.photobucket.com/albums/q100/megajette2/Resistornetworkwork-1.png

Not sure what I'm doing wrong. I tried doing it other ways but my final answer doesn't come out right.

epenguin has given you a good hint.

I need some way of referring to the nodes so we have a common understanding. The network has 4 nodes above, and 4 nodes below. Starting with the upper row going from left (the open circuit at one end of Req) to right, label them a,b,c,d. With the lower row, going from right to left (the open circuit at the other end of Req), label them e,f,g,h. We have now described the complete network such that the resistance between a and h is Req.

Refer to the resistance between two nodes as R(ab) for example (here R(ab) = 5). When a node is considered electrically equivalent to another node, write d=e (for example), then reduce all relations to the earlier occurring node ('d' in this case). Write parallel as || and series as + (since series resistances are just summed up). All this is useful notation to help you conceptualise and solve future problems.

Electrical equivalence occurs when there's a short (no resistance) between two points. While you've clearly seen that R(de) = 0 and hence d = e, you've missed c = f. Once you see this, you can actually disregard the circuit downstream of nodes c and f (meaning there's no need to have calculated 20||5 = 4 and 10||10 = 5 as you did).

OK, so we have c=f. Everything connected to node f becomes connected to node c. So now we have 2 sets of parallel resistances connected across the 15Ω, i.e.

R(bc) = 20||10 = 20/3

R(gc) = 5||10 = 10/3

So R(bg) = 15||(20/3 + 10/3) = 15||10 = 6

and Req = R(ah) = R(ab) + R(bg) + R(gh) = 5 + 6 + 10 = 21Ω.

Try to do it in this systematic way in the future and you won't go wrong. :smile:
 
Thanks so much for your explanation. I'm pretty new to this stuff and kind of having a hard time. I'll definitely use this on the rest of my homework. Thanks again.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
8K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
13K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K