Equivalent stress in a welded part

  • Thread starter Thread starter guideonl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equivalent Stress
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the calculation of equivalent stress in welded parts under torque and bending stresses. There is debate over the accuracy of two different equations for equivalent stress, with one being a simplistic approximation and the other considered more accurate. A typographical error is suggested regarding the use of "2" versus "3" in the equations, with the latter being the standard. Additionally, participants discuss the use of plain text symbols for mathematical equations and recommend using LaTeX for Greek letters and other symbols. The conversation highlights the importance of clarity and accuracy in engineering calculations and communication.
guideonl
Messages
58
Reaction score
6
Hi everyone,

The practical equivalent stress in a welded part, subjected to torque and bending stresses, is the square root of the sum of the two squared shear stresses (from torque & equal shear) squared, + the normal stress (from bending) squared. Is it accepted/common to use this way to get the equivalent stress, or it must be computed from the 2 dimensional equation for the equivalent stress = the squared root of normal stress squared + 3 times the shear stress squared?
By the way, I found somewhere a similar equation to that mentioned above, with 2 times the shear stress squared instead of 3 times the shear stress squared. Is it a mistake or just another method?
Also, I am new in this forum, and I would like to know if there is a simpler way to present questions using engineering known formulas & symbols? If positive - please advise how to do so.

Thank you, Guideon
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
guideonl: The 2 might be a typographic mistake, or might be applicable to a specific material, if clearly described. If in doubt, assume the 2 is a typographic mistake, and use 3, instead.

The first equation you described, although it is hard to understand the way you wrote it, appears to be a simplistic approximation, and not too accurate. The second equation you described is more accurate and more correct.

Yes, there is a standard symbology for typing mathematical equations in plain text. Use caret (^) for exponentiation, asterisk (*) for multiplication, solidus (/) for division, plus sign (+) for addition, hyphen (-) for subtraction, and parentheses (( )), brackets ([ ]), and braces ({ }) for grouping. The precedence of the above arithmetic operators, in order of decreasing precedence from left to right, is:

- (unary) ( ) ^ * / + -​

Therefore, an example of an equation is y = pi*[2*x^3 - (5*x)^2]/(3*x^0.5). Notice square root of x is written x^0.5. And notice in 2*x^3, x^3 is performed before multiplying by 2, because exponentiation has higher precedence than multiplication (see the above precedence list). Also, pi means 3.141 593.
 
nvn said:
guideonl: The 2 might be a typographic mistake, or might be applicable to a specific material, if clearly described. If in doubt, assume the 2 is a typographic mistake, and use 3, instead.

The first equation you described, although it is hard to understand the way you wrote it, appears to be a simplistic approximation, and not too accurate. The second equation you described is more accurate and more correct.

Yes, there is a standard symbology for typing mathematical equations in plain text. Use caret (^) for exponentiation, asterisk (*) for multiplication, solidus (/) for division, plus sign (+) for addition, hyphen (-) for subtraction, and parentheses (( )), brackets ([ ]), and braces ({ }) for grouping. The precedence of the above arithmetic operators, in order of decreasing precedence from left to right, is:

- (unary) ( ) ^ * / + -​

Therefore, an example of an equation is y = pi*[2*x^3 - (5*x)^2]/(3*x^0.5). Notice square root of x is written x^0.5. And notice in 2*x^3, x^3 is performed before multiplying by 2, because exponentiation has higher precedence than multiplication (see the above precedence list). Also, pi means 3.141 593.

Thank you nvn,
I am familiar with the symbols you wrote in your answer, but in my question related to symbols, I meant symbols for the stresses (such as sigma & tau Greek letters for the normal & shear stresses). How can I use such symbols at this forum?

Guideon
 
Posted June 2024 - 15 years after starting this class. I have learned a whole lot. To get to the short course on making your stock car, late model, hobby stock E-mod handle, look at the index below. Read all posts on Roll Center, Jacking effect and Why does car drive straight to the wall when I gas it? Also read You really have two race cars. This will cover 90% of problems you have. Simply put, the car pushes going in and is loose coming out. You do not have enuff downforce on the right...
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly
Back
Top