Error Analysis: Addition of Quantities with Uncertainty

  • Thread starter Thread starter NachoNovo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analysis
AI Thread Summary
When performing error analysis for the addition of quantities with uncertainty, it is crucial to determine whether to use rounded values or raw data. The discussion emphasizes that the uncertainty should be represented in the last significant figure of the measurement. The user is uncertain about whether to apply rounded values (8.55 and 3.87) or the original raw data (8.5452545 and 3.865898) for calculations. The importance of significant figures in representing uncertainty is highlighted, but the user seeks clarity on the correct approach for their report. Ultimately, using raw data is generally recommended for more precise calculations in error analysis.
NachoNovo
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi there,

I have a pretty basic question on error analysis. say we want to obtain a quantity which is given by u+v.

if u = 8.5452545 and has uncert 0.025454. it would be quoted as 8.55(2) and if v = 3.865898 and has uncert 0.04124343.

it would be quoted as 3.87(4).

but when calculating say u+v...

do i a) use 8.55 and 3.87 and their rounded uncertainties.

or b) use the raw data?

thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The uncertainty of a given value must be in the last significant figure.
So if u is given as 8.5452545 the uncertainty is in the last figure 0f 5.
It means that u lies between 8.5452544 and u = 8.5452546.
This is what is meant by SIGNIFICANT figures.
Hope this helps
 
no sorry it doesn't help.

I'm not sure when calculating a new value experimentally if I use the rounded values or the raw values of the old data?

I know what sig figs mean.
 
where did these figures come from?
Are they from a question you have seen?
Were they given to you to test your understanding?
Are they values you have measured?
 
The values are made up. I am writing up a report and wasn't sure what to do.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top