Error analysis: significant figues

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the application of significant figures in calculating the volume of a box with given dimensions. The calculated volume of 10233.32 cm³ should be rounded to 10200 cm³, as it must reflect the measurement with the fewest significant figures, which is three in this case. There is some debate regarding the significance of terminal zeroes, with suggestions to express the final result in scientific notation for clarity. The importance of significant figures is emphasized as a reflection of measurement accuracy, indicating that a three-figure measurement implies a precision of better than 1%. Overall, the consensus is to maintain accuracy in calculations while adhering to the rules of significant figures.
armolinasf
Messages
195
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have three measurements for the L, W, H of a box: 40.4, 14.9, 17.0. the volume would then be 10233.32cm. each of my measurements has three sig figures, and it says in my book that with multiplication the product should have no more sig figures than the measurement with the fewest sig figures. So does this mean that my measurement would be 10200cm? thanks for the help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
armolinasf said:
So does this mean that my measurement would be 10200cm? thanks for the help

Exactly so.
If it helps, think of significant figures as your degree of accuracy in a question.

Edit: Just as a clarifying example,

If I want to multiply 4.8 m by 9.4854, my exact result will be 45.52992 m.

This result is extremely accurate. It's so precise that it takes into account all the units down to 20 micrometers.

But how could we know that it's the correct answer when your first measurement was only held 2 digits of information? Perhaps, if you measured closer, you would have found that it was 4.78923 m instead.
 
Last edited:
More precisely, it would be 10200 cm3.

I've seen some disagreement in texts about whether terminal zeroes are significant. It might be safer to write the answer as 1.02 x 104 cm3.
 
I was always taught that terminal zeroes are only significant if it is noted that they are significant (i.e 345000m six sig figs is completely different to 34500 3 sig figs) but yes as the others have stated, keep as many figures as you can until you reach the final answer and then round to the specified significant figure
 
I agree with these responses, you should round off to the lowest number of significant figures.
A good way, I find, to appreciate the meaning of significant figures is to realize what the number you write down is NOT telling you.
The length of your box is given as 40.4cm, this means it is NOT 40.3cm and it is NOT 40.5cm. This means you cannot calculate an answer with any knowledge of the number beyond 3 figures.
Significant figures are also closely related to the accuracy of measurement. If you quote a measurement to 3 significant figures it implies that the measurement was made to better than 1%. the 40.4cm measurement given implies that the measurement could be made to within +/- 0.1cm which is about 1/4%...very accurate
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top