Error in Modern Theory of Critical Phenomena by Shang-Keng Ma

  • Thread starter Thread starter matematikuvol
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Mistake
matematikuvol
Messages
190
Reaction score
0
In book Modern theory of critical phenomena author Shang - Keng Ma in page 17.

\sigma_{\vec{k}}=V^{-\frac{1}{2}}\int d^3\vec{x}e^{-i\vec{k}\cdot\vec{x}}\sigma(\vec{x})

\sigma(\vec{x})=V^{-\frac{1}{2}}\sum_{\vec{k}}e^{i\vec{k}\cdot \vec{x}}\sigma_{\vec{k}}

Is this correct? How can inversion of continual FT be discrete FT? Thanks for your answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The sum is to be understood as an integral over a comb of very narrow functions which approach delta functions in the limit V to infinity, i.e. think of the FT of a product of a periodic function with a rectangle of width V.
The integral over the delta functions is then equivalent to a sum over their locations.
 
matematikuvol said:
In book Modern theory of critical phenomena author Shang - Keng Ma in page 17.

\sigma_{\vec{k}}=V^{-\frac{1}{2}}\int d^3\vec{x}e^{-i\vec{k}\cdot\vec{x}}\sigma(\vec{x})

\sigma(\vec{x})=V^{-\frac{1}{2}}\sum_{\vec{k}}e^{i\vec{k}\cdot \vec{x}}\sigma_{\vec{k}}

Is this correct? How can inversion of continual FT be discrete FT? Thanks for your answer.

If the x-domain is bounded, the k-domain will be discrete. This is what happens for an ordinary Fourier series for functions on a bounded domain, or periodic:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourier_series
 
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...

Similar threads

Back
Top