Error in special relativity Albert Einstein assumed

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the interpretation of light behavior in special relativity, specifically regarding a boxcar scenario proposed by Albert Einstein. Observer 1, inside the boxcar, perceives a light pulse traveling vertically, while Observer 2, outside the boxcar, sees the light pulse moving diagonally due to the boxcar's motion. The key error identified is the misunderstanding of how the light pulse's velocity components interact with the motion of the boxcar, leading to a misinterpretation of the distance traveled by the light pulse in both frames of reference. The conclusion emphasizes that the speed of light remains constant at 'c' in all inertial frames, and the perceived direction of light varies based on the observer's motion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity principles
  • Familiarity with the concept of inertial frames
  • Knowledge of light's constant speed (c) in a vacuum
  • Basic grasp of vector components in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the first postulate of relativity
  • Learn about time dilation and its mathematical formulation
  • Explore the concept of light clocks and their significance in relativity
  • Investigate the effects of relative motion on the perception of light paths
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching special relativity, and anyone interested in the foundational concepts of light behavior in moving reference frames.

  • #31


Tuomaaca said:
I think i understand your question. Correct me if I'm wrong, but here's what I'm getting:

The observer emits a "pulse of light" from his flashlight to the center of the mirror ("straight upward"). The light goes up. Since the mirror is moving with a velocity (let's say v), the light pulse should hit at a spot vt away from (or "behind") the center of the mirror, where t is the time it takes for light to travel from floor to ceiling.

But, a contradiction! According to Observer 1 (who is moving with a constant velocity so that he can't even tell that he's moving), he emitted a pulse "straight up" and it should also come "straight down," right back at his flashlight.
no i don't agree ..
here what is wrong and i said about 200 times but seems everybody ignore it YOU said:
he emitted a pulse "straight up" and it should also come "straight down," right back at his flashlight.
yes it will come straight down but not back to his flashlight
this observer emitted a flashlight straight upward moving with velocity C
observer 1 is in the train.
observer 2 is outside.
[PLAIN]http://img686.imageshack.us/img686/8618/imgwkv.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32


yeah another way of explaining it(AFTER READING ABOVE POST):
if u say that according to observer1 the mirror is not moving away from him and so is the light
he sees the light moving upward in c and downward again and that what really happens as he can't see that light returned to flash light while it didn't
but since the frame was moving with velocity vtrain then light should be moving upward with velocity c and moving diagonally with velocity v train and that s impossible
 
  • #33


If the pulse of light is aimed vertically in the frame where the flashlight is moving to the right then it is aimed to the left in the frame where the flashlight is stationary. You cannot have it be vertical in both frames.
 
  • #34


thetrice said:
yeah another way of explaining it(AFTER READING ABOVE POST):
if u say that according to observer1 the mirror is not moving away from him and so is the light
he sees the light moving upward in c and downward again and that what really happens as he can't see that light returned to flash light while it didn't
but since the frame was moving with velocity vtrain then light should be moving upward with velocity c and moving diagonally with velocity v train and that s impossible

Observer1 sees the light moving straight up and down with speed "c".
Observer2 sees the light "aberrated", i.e. moving at an angle in the direction of vtrain. Light in the frame of Observer2 moves at "c" just the same.
 
  • #35


thetrice said:
no i don't agree ..
here what is wrong and i said about 200 times but seems everybody ignore it

No, you are either ignoring or misunderstanding what everybody else has said in this thread. I don't see any sign that either "side" is going to budge in this discussion, so there's no point in continuing it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
750
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
7K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K