Estimate Vector Field Surface Integral

maxhersch
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Thread moved from the technical forums, so no Homework Help Template is shown.
DkKHpDI.png


I assume this is a simple summation of the normal components of the vector fields at the given points multiplied by dA which in this case would be 1/4.

jyxG7rs.png

This is not being accepted as the correct answer. Not sure where I am going wrong. My textbook doesn't discuss estimating surface integrals of vector fields but I assume it's done this way, similar to any other integral. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi maxhersch,

The vector <1/4, 3/4, 1> is not a unit normal vector pointing in the positive z direction. It is a vector that points along the direction between the origin and the point (1/4, 3/4, 1). A unit normal vector pointing in the positive z-direction is <0, 0, 1>. The point that this vector is attached to for the purpose of carrying out this integral is (1/4, 3/4, 0), but in the usual formalism of Gibbs vector calculus, we do not usually show this second condition.
Recall that each point is assigned its own unit normal vector for the purpose of carrying out the integral, but the coordinates of the point do not appear as components of the unit normal vector. They are relatively indepedent numbers, as the direction of the unit normal vector is determined by the orientation of a small section of surface containing the point, not the point all by itself.
 
slider142 said:
Hi maxhersch,

The vector <1/4, 3/4, 1> is not a unit normal vector pointing in the positive z direction. It is a vector that points along the direction between the origin and the point (1/4, 3/4, 1). A unit normal vector pointing in the positive z-direction is <0, 0, 1>. The point that this vector is attached to for the purpose of carrying out this integral is (1/4, 3/4, 0), but in the usual formalism of Gibbs vector calculus, we do not usually show this second condition.
Recall that each point is assigned its own unit normal vector for the purpose of carrying out the integral, but the coordinates of the point do not appear as components of the unit normal vector. They are relatively indepedent numbers, as the direction of the unit normal vector is determined by the orientation of a small section of surface containing the point, not the point all by itself.

Perfect thanks a lot
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top