Estimating Flattening of the Earth

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fightfish
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on estimating the flattening of the Earth using the formula 1 - R_P/R_E, where R_P is the polar radius and R_E is the equatorial radius. The initial approach involves approximations based on the assumption that the Earth's shape deviates slightly from a sphere, applying Newton's law of gravity to model the Earth as an oblate spheroid. The calculations lead to a relationship that suggests the flattening can be expressed as a function of angular velocity, gravitational constant, and density. A participant suggests that further simplifications may not be necessary, indicating that precise values for angular velocity and Earth's mass can be directly utilized. The conversation highlights the complexity of accurately estimating Earth's flattening while questioning the validity of the approximations made.
Fightfish
Messages
953
Reaction score
118
Homework Statement
Estimate the flattening of the earth, given by 1 - \frac{R_{P}}{R_{E}}, where R_{P} is half the distance between the north pole and south pole and R_{E} the radius of the equator.

The attempt at a solution
Well, I did manage to obtain a solution of sorts, but it involved a lot of approximations along the way, which I am not sure if they are all justifiable.

We start off with the base assumption that the flattening of the Earth is very small, such that there is relatively little deviation from a spherical shape.
Then, Newton's law of gravity is approximately true for this oblate spheroid. Modeling the Earth as a frictionless incompressible fluid, in order for a point at the pole surface to be in hydrostatic equilibrium with one at the equatorial surface, we have:
\frac{GM}{R_{P}^{2}} = \frac{GM}{R_{E}^{2}} + R_{E} \omega^{2}
\frac{R_{E}^{2}}{R_{P}^{2}} = 1 + \frac{R_{E}^{3} \omega^{2}}{GM}​

Now, if the Earth were a perfect sphere, M = \frac{4}{3}\pi R_{S}^{3} \rho. Since the flattening of the Earth is very small, we expect \frac{R_{E}^{3}}{R_{S}^{3}} \approx 1. Then,
\frac{R_{P}}{R_{E}} = (1 + \frac{3 \omega^{2}}{4G\pi\rho})^{-\frac{1}{2}}​

As we expect \frac{R_{E}}{R_{P}} to be very close to 1, this implies that \frac{3 \omega^{2}}{4G\pi\rho} \ll 1, and hence
\frac{R_{P}}{R_{E}} \approx 1 - \frac{3 \omega^{2}}{8G\pi\rho}​

Thus, the flattening of the earth
1 - \frac{R_{P}}{R_{E}} \approx \frac{3 \omega^{2}}{8G\pi\rho} = \frac{3 \pi}{2GT^{2}\rho}​

Does this look reasonable?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fightfish said:
Estimate the flattening of the earth, given by 1 - \frac{R_{P}}{R_{E}}, where R_{P} is half the distance between the north pole and south pole and R_{E} the radius of the equator.

...
\frac{R_{E}^{2}}{R_{P}^{2}} = 1 + \frac{R_{E}^{3} \omega^{2}}{GM}

I would stop right there. You can work out \omega = 2\pi/T (T = period of one rotation of the earth) and you can look up M (= mass of the earth). There is no need to make any approximations as you have done.

AM
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top