Ethical Dilemna - Finding Money In Random Places

  • Thread starter Thread starter GCT
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Money Random
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the ethical implications of keeping money found in random places, exploring various scenarios and personal experiences related to this dilemma. Participants consider factors such as the amount of money, the context of the find, and their moral obligations to return it or keep it.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the amount of money found influences their decision on whether to investigate its owner, with varying thresholds mentioned.
  • Others argue that the container in which the money is found (e.g., a plain bag versus a business money bag) affects their ethical considerations.
  • A few participants share personal anecdotes about returning found money, indicating that context and location play significant roles in their decisions.
  • Some express skepticism about the likelihood of prosecution for keeping found money, questioning the enforcement of laws regarding theft in such situations.
  • There are discussions about the implications of "salvage rights" and how they might apply to found money, with references to legal principles.
  • Participants note that the traceability of cash could impact the ethical considerations of keeping it, particularly if serial numbers are recorded.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the ethical implications of keeping found money. There are multiple competing views on what factors should influence the decision to keep or return the money, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying assumptions about the legality and morality of keeping found money, with some referencing specific legal concepts and others focusing on personal ethics. The discussion reflects a range of perspectives influenced by individual experiences and societal norms.

At what dollar amount would you have initiated an investigation?


  • Total voters
    23
GCT
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
1,745
Reaction score
0
I just found a ten dollar bill while taking a walk through my suburbia , it's seemed pretty obvious to me that there was no dilemna to be acknolwedged here and that it was perfectly fine to keep the money - am I going to ring the doorbell on every house and ask " is this your 10 bucks " - the answer to that is no.

So here is the question - at what dollar amount would you have sensed the obligation to initiate an investigation before you kept it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is it in a money bag like a business uses and might have been a theft or a paper bag?

If it's in a plain paper bag, it's mine.
 
I found five pounds on the floor of the local shop yesterday. I gave it to the woman on the checkout in case somebody came back for it. I've also given as little as a pound back when I got too much change before. Of course it depends on the situation but in most cases I'd at least try something to find the person who lost it.
 
Recently, there was one similar thread (not the same subject) - about one old lady finding 10K.

It depends on where you found them
- a place where all people are rich (1000 would be mine answer in that case)
- a place where people cannot afford to lose 10 (10$ in that case)
- bad neighborhood (best not to touch the money) (I would never investigate)
 
I found 3 dollars in the change dispenser at an automated check out. I gave it to the clerk overseeing the check out stands, just in case the person realized they forgot their change, that was an undertandible mistake and i wouldn't feel right taking it.

But a paper bag lying in the road with hundreds of thousands of dollars = my lucky day. That's really dumb. I would donate part of it to the local animal shelters though.

GCT, you forgot an option for "none of the above".
 
Last edited:
Unless the quantity is huge, it depends on the container. If you literally find a big pile of cash in the street, it may actually be illegal to take it if it fell out of an armored car, even if it isn't in a bag.
 
Who carries more than 1000 cash either in plain or marked paper bag?
I think most people use credit cards. I don't own one but I do shopping with my university card + debit card. I never have cash of more than 200.
 
  • #10
I don't think I would go door-to-door finding the rightful owner of ten dollars, but I couldn't keep it either. At my grocery store there's a food bank collection box - I'd put it in an envelope and put it in the box. Especially now, they need it more than I do.

A hundred dollars? Yeah, I'd probably knock on a few doors, at least.
 
  • #11
lisab said:
A hundred dollars? Yeah, I'd probably knock on a few doors, at least.
I would just assume that some dishonest person would say that it's theirs. I guess I don't have much faith in people in general. :frown:
 
  • #12
russ_watters said:
The officials say they will prosecute any thieving motorist they can find.http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpa...7A15752C1A961948260&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all

Good luck with that. Money blowing in the wind?

What crime is that again?

My guess is they didn't prosecute a single person. It sounds like a scare tactic to hopefully jog some consciences and encourage whatever recovery they could. Whoever spilled it was on the hook.

If it was a really lot of money, I'd turn it in immediately and then reread Steinbeck's The Pearl, before I started second-guessing myself.
 
  • #13
Back when I was in high school I found a $10 bill on the floor and turned it into the Dean.
 
  • #14
LowlyPion said:
Good luck with that. Money blowing in the wind?

What crime is that again?
Wikipedia has something, but the references seem to be broken. :frown:
 
  • #15
Hurkyl said:
Wikipedia has something, but the references seem to be broken. :frown:

If a law can't be enforced, it has no practical effect.

The idea that there would be prosecution is pretty absurd under the circumstances of the situation, and it was clearly a hollow threat. Personally I'd be tempted not to turn it in if that was their attitude.
 
  • #16
LowlyPion said:
Good luck with that. Money blowing in the wind?

What crime is that again?
Taking something that isn't yours would be called "theft"...
My guess is they didn't prosecute a single person. It sounds like a scare tactic to hopefully jog some consciences and encourage whatever recovery they could. Whoever spilled it was on the hook.
Definitely not a scare tactic, but it may have been hard to identify anyone. I'll see if i can find links about people prosecuted for this...
 
  • #17
russ_watters said:
Taking something that isn't yours would be called "theft"... Definitely not a scare tactic, but it may have been hard to identify anyone. I'll see if i can find links about people prosecuted for this...

Under the law it maybe called theft. But I'd say it is highly improbable, if you didn't incriminate yourself by say bragging you found $350 and had a great night at the bar, telling anyone and everyone, that anything could be proved.

So they have your picture? They have you picking up something? Cash is highly fungible and proving it as theirs and how much it was absent recovery in your possession and your refusal to cooperate, I'd say there's virtually no case.
 
  • #18
LowlyPion said:
Under the law it maybe called theft. But I'd say it is highly improbable, if you didn't incriminate yourself by say bragging you found $350 and had a great night at the bar, telling anyone and everyone, that anything could be proved.

So they have your picture? They have you picking up something? Cash is highly fungible and proving it as theirs and how much it was absent recovery in your possession and your refusal to cooperate, I'd say there's virtually no case.

since all money is uniquely identifiable, it is a reasonable request to ask that they provide serial numbers.
 
  • #19
LowlyPion said:
Under the law it maybe called theft. ... I'd say there's virtually no case.
You asked what crime was committed. You got an answer. Talk about whether or not there is a case is irrelevant to whether or not it's a crime. :-p

Angling back to the original topic you seem to be pushing for the "it's okay to commit a crime if you don't get caught" school of ethics... is that intentional?
 
  • #20
Taking something that isn't yours would be called "theft"...
I believe this reminds me of admiralty law. The captain's word is law. When he goes out in the ocean on his boat, he has a 40 foot floating country. It's his country and he is a dictator. He can throw you in the brig for anything he wants. If I'm floating out there in the ocean on my boat and I find another boat and there's nobody on it, who owns it? Me, now, I'm the captain! It's called salvage rights. I found it, no body else claimed it, end of story, and it's not theft.

Everybody has a right to due process under common law, but this definitely isn't common law since the ownership of what property is not clearly defined.
 
  • #21
If the bills were sequential, or the serial numbers recorded, then it's possible that they could catch someone using them. If they're non-sequential and the numbers unrecorded, it would be virtually impossible to trace them.
 
  • #22
Mk said:
I believe this reminds me of admiralty law. The captain's word is law. When he goes out in the ocean on his boat, he has a 40 foot floating country. It's his country and he is a dictator. He can throw you in the brig for anything he wants. If I'm floating out there in the ocean on my boat and I find another boat and there's nobody on it, who owns it? Me, now, I'm the captain! It's called salvage rights. I found it, no body else claimed it, end of story, and it's not theft.

Everybody has a right to due process under common law, but this definitely isn't common law since the ownership of what property is not clearly defined.
but say the captain of that ship and all his crew had been blown off the ship by a wave just as u were passing and were swimming back to get on to the boat... and you just hop on their ship cause no ones on it and take off with it. I'm sure that's called theft.

btw i'd still keep the money... not saying its right but does it really matter? the person that lost it should take better care of their money i would expect the same if i had lost money of my own. I'm not going to be mad at anyone except for myself. a wallet or something on the other hand... if it had like ID or important information etc. then i would definitely give that back cause those dumb documents take FOREVER to get all back lol
 
  • #23
Mk said:
I believe this reminds me of admiralty law. The captain's word is law. When he goes out in the ocean on his boat, he has a 40 foot floating country. It's his country and he is a dictator. He can throw you in the brig for anything he wants. If I'm floating out there in the ocean on my boat and I find another boat and there's nobody on it, who owns it? Me, now, I'm the captain! It's called salvage rights. I found it, no body else claimed it, end of story, and it's not theft.

Everybody has a right to due process under common law, but this definitely isn't common law since the ownership of what property is not clearly defined.
That's a clearly defined case: the true owner of the ship can still rightfully claim it - that's in the link that Hurkyl posted.

That applies to the money (and anything else) too. The problem in the case of the money is whether or not the true owner can actually identify it. Note: that's a different question than whether it is illegal to take it.
 
  • #24
As I see it, property can be juridically lost, in that priorly owned objects become ownerless objects.

If a person cannot make a probable case for the ownership of some item, then his CLAIM that it is his property is nothing more than that, a claim, to be judged alongside others.


If a finder of some object on basis of the type of object may conclude in good faith that the original possessor (whether owner or not) cannot be found, then "finders keepers" is a valid principle.

If I see an old woman losing a 100$ note out of her pocket, then I am necessarily a thief in keeping it for myself.
If I came half an hour later, and stumbled across that note, I would not necessarily be a thief in keeping it for myself.
 
  • #25
Before taking the bag with thousands of dollars, watch the movie "No Country for Old Men". Might make you think twice.

But seriously, a bag with thousands of dollars would probably be drug money. If it is marked, spending it might land you in real trouble.
 
  • #26
Since a BAG of money is most likely evidence of some sort of crime, then we have a juridical obligation to inform the police about our find.
 
  • #27
I put the last two, but that was assuming I was in a big city, if I were to be in a small town such as my own I'd start at $100.
 
  • #28
I'd inform the police, if no one claims it it would be mine.

I've heard several times of people losing a bag of money, it was there complete savings that they were going to put into the bank or use for a purchase. I consider keeping such a bag without telling the authorities a real crime.

I also heard a case that someone found a bag of money, a huge amount, went to the police, no one claimed the money (probably criminal money), and that person got to keep it, now that's a good find.
 
  • #29
Evo said:
I found 3 dollars in the change dispenser at an automated check out. I gave it to the clerk overseeing the check out stands, just in case the person realized they forgot their change, that was an undertandible mistake and i wouldn't feel right taking it.

But a paper bag lying in the road with hundreds of thousands of dollars = my lucky day. That's really dumb. I would donate part of it to the local animal shelters though.

GCT, you forgot an option for "none of the above".

You are right , is it possible to add it now?


I found the $ 10 bill on the sidewalk and did not have the ingenuity to plan for a foolproof way to find the owner , anyone is able to claim it as their own ... it's just plain dumb to ask the question from door to door because if you had the moral incentive to find the owner you also have the full obligation to find the rightful owner and this means inevitably doing more research and questioning the validity of anyone who claims the money to be theirs. You just may find that your neighbor is an ***hole.

And thus the question arises , are you creating more trouble by investigating the matter , since you might as well keep it for yourself - regardless of how much is involved - if you do not want to do a full proof investigation. And if you were to give it to the police , how would they really manage it , would they have the capacity to find the rightful owner?
 
  • #30
GCT said:
And if you were to give it to the police , how would they really manage it , would they have the capacity to find the rightful owner?
They really do not have to do anything, just wait for someone to show up who can say exactly how much was lost, where and when.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
6K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
7K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K