Etracting ZPP from the vacuum is in violation of the 1st law of thermodynamics?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of extracting Zero Point Energy (ZPP) from the vacuum and its implications regarding the first law of thermodynamics. Participants argue that extracting energy from the vacuum does not violate this law, as energy is merely transferred from one state to another. Prof. Dr. Claus W. Turtur's theories suggest that an electric field can trigger vacuum energy similarly to how a spark ignites fuel. However, the feasibility of practical ZPP extraction remains unproven, with current tests conducted on a small scale.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the first law of thermodynamics
  • Familiarity with Zero Point Energy (ZPP) concepts
  • Basic knowledge of quantum mechanics
  • Awareness of energy transfer mechanisms in physical systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the theories of Prof. Dr. Claus W. Turtur on vacuum energy extraction
  • Explore experimental setups for testing Zero Point Energy claims
  • Investigate the implications of energy transfer in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the role of electric fields in energy systems
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, energy researchers, and anyone interested in the theoretical and practical aspects of Zero Point Energy and thermodynamics.

jonnyk
Messages
81
Reaction score
0
Although I've yet to see any device that actually works I don not understand how the principle of extracting ZPP or vacuum energy from the vacuum and turning it into mechanical energy violates the 1st law of thermodynamics BECAUSE energy is just being transferred from one place(where it EXISTS) to another(the macro level where it acts as mechanical energy). So I don't get that parrticular accusation. ANOTHER accusation is that how can one get more energy out of a system then we put it? BUT this depends ont he definition. For example the flame used to ignite say petrol has way less energy then the energy we then get out of it. WHAT physicists like Prof. Dr. Claus W. Turtur of the University of Applied Sciences Braunschweig-Wolfenbüttel, Germany, say is that with an electric field or pulse, as far as i understood, one can trigger the vacuum energy to come out much in the same way as a spark igniting fuel. SO on this basis where is the problem?

Thankyou very much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The flame that lights the petrol only provides enough energy to get the molecules over the "hump" per say, and it is the energy stored in the molecules themselves that gets released. Like if you push a car over a small speed bump at the top of a hill, it takes a little bit of energy to get it going, but once it's down at the bottom, it takes a lot more energy to get it back up. Hence why we can't simply reuse petrol and other fuels.

If it turns out that we can extract ZPP energy from space like getting it out of a battery, then so be it. Currently we just have no concrete reason to think so.
 
@Drakkith

Drakkith said:
The flame that lights the petrol only provides enough energy to get the molecules over the "hump" per say, and it is the energy stored in the molecules themselves that gets released. Like if you push a car over a small speed bump at the top of a hill, it takes a little bit of energy to get it going, but once it's down at the bottom, it takes a lot more energy to get it back up. Hence why we can't simply reuse petrol and other fuels.

JK- True and the same is claimed for Zero Point Energy where a certain high voltage electric spark/magnetic flux destabilizes the system in the quantum vacuum making it release it's potential energy.

If it turns out that we can extract ZPP energy from space like getting it out of a battery, then so be it. Currently we just have no concrete reason to think so.

JK- THIS is exactly what Thomas Valone and Prof. Dr. Claus. W. Turtur are claiming is the case. I'm not sure either whether it is true because the tests have only been done on a very small scale. Here is a video:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
677
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K