A Euler-Lagrange Equations: EM Field Term

Gene Naden
Messages
320
Reaction score
64
This problem is about one small step in the derivation of Maxwell's equations in free space from the field Lagrangian. The Lagrangian contains a term proportional to

##\partial \mu A_\nu \partial^\mu A^\nu - \partial \nu A\mu \partial ^\mu A^\nu## where A is the four-vector potential.

The Euler-Lagrange equation requires a derivative ##\partial \mu ( \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial ( \partial \mu A \nu )})##

The problem is to get a term ##\partial \mu ( \partial ^\mu A^\nu - \partial ^\nu A ^\mu)##

I want to apply the product rule of calculus to compute ##\frac {\partial ( \partial_\alpha A_\beta \partial ^\alpha A^\beta)}{\partial ( \partial_\mu A_\nu )}## and ##\frac {\partial ( \partial_\beta A_\alpha \partial ^\alpha A^\beta)}{\partial ( \partial_\mu A_\nu )}##

This should bring in a factor of two.

But I am having difficulty managing the indices. The stack exchange says I can use the identity for ##\frac{ \partial ( \partial_\alpha A _\beta )}{\partial ( \partial_\mu A_\nu)}## in terms of the Kronecker ##\delta## but I am unsure of the corresponding identity for ##\frac{ \partial ( \partial^\alpha A ^\beta )}{\partial ( \partial_\mu A_\nu)}##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gene Naden said:
but I am unsure of the corresponding identity for ##\frac{ \partial ( \partial^\alpha A ^\beta )}{\partial ( \partial_\mu A_\nu)}##

Lower the indices in the numerator by extracting a metric from it, i.e., ##\partial^\alpha A^\beta = \eta^{\alpha\gamma}\eta^{\beta\delta} \partial_\gamma A_\delta##. The metric components are constant and can be taken out of the derivative. You can then apply your previous relation with deltas, essentially leaving you with the metric tensors.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Gene Naden
Thanks, I get ##\frac{\partial \left( \partial ^\alpha A^\beta \right)}{\partial \left( \partial _\mu A_\nu \right)} = \eta ^{\alpha^\mu} \eta ^{\beta \nu}## and then it works out, just as you say.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Back
Top